Using a systematic review, we investigated whether there is an
increased risk of post-operative infection in patients who have
received an intra-articular corticosteroid injection to the hip
for osteoarthritis prior to total hip arthroplasty (THA). Studies dealing with an intra-articular corticosteroid injection
to the hip and infection following subsequent THA were identified
from databases for the period between 1990 to 2013. Retrieved articles
were independently assessed for their methodological quality.Aims
Methods
This study compared the outcome of total knee
replacement (TKR) in adult patients with fixed- and mobile-bearing prostheses
during the first post-operative year and at five years’ follow-up,
using gait parameters as a new objective measure. This double-blind
randomised controlled clinical trial included 55 patients with mobile-bearing (n
= 26) and fixed-bearing (n = 29) prostheses of the same design,
evaluated pre-operatively and post-operatively at six weeks, three
months, six months, one year and five years. Each participant undertook
two walking trials of 30 m and completed the EuroQol questionnaire,
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index,
Knee Society score, and visual analogue scales for pain and stiffness.
Gait analysis was performed using five miniature angular rate sensors
mounted on the trunk (sacrum), each thigh and calf. The study population
was divided into two groups according to age (≤ 70 years Improvements in most gait parameters at five years’ follow-up
were greater for fixed-bearing TKRs in older patients (>
70 years),
and greater for mobile-bearing TKRs in younger patients (≤ 70 years).
These findings should be confirmed by an extended age controlled
study, as the ideal choice of prosthesis might depend on the age
of the patient at the time of surgery.
We carried out a retrospective review of 155 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis who had been treated surgically and followed up regularly: 77 were evaluated at a mean of 6.5 years (5 to 8) after surgery by two independent observers. The outcome was assessed using the scoring system of Roland and Morris, and the rating system of Prolo, Oklund and Butcher. Instability was determined according to the criteria described by White and Panjabi. A significant decrease in low back pain and disability was seen. An excellent or good outcome was noted in 79% of patients; 9% showed secondary radiological instability. Surgical decompression is a safe and efficient procedure. In the absence of preoperative radiological evidence of instability, fusion is not required.
