We have followed for 13 years a consecutive series of 31 patients who had open repair of a torn meniscus. They were between 13 and 43 years of age at the time of operation and all had intact stabilising ligaments. Comparison was made with a matched group of normal subjects of similar age and level of activity.

The total rate of failure after meniscal repair was 29%; three of the repaired menisci did not heal and six reruptured during the follow-up period. At follow-up 80% of the patients had normal knee function for daily activities. Radiological changes were found in seven. Two had reduction of the joint space (Ahlbäck grade 1), one with successful and one with failed repair. In the control group of uninjured subjects one knee showed Fairbank changes but none had changes according to Ahlbäck. The incidence of radiological changes did not differ between the group with meniscal repair and the control group but knee function was reduced after meniscal repair (p < 0.001).

We conclude that the long-term results of meniscal repair in stable knees are good with nearly normal function and a low incidence of low-grade radiological changes.

We compared two cementless femoral components, the 'isoelastic' Butel stem and the more rigid PCA design, in a randomised, prospective study of 56 patients with a mean follow-up of 4 years (2 to 5). Patients were matched in 28 pairs, and one of each pair was treated with each femoral component. The isoelastic stem gave fewer signs of stress shielding radiologically, but both the Harris hip score and the visual analogue pain scale showed significantly inferior results at the two-year and three-year follow-up. The overall failure rates for the femoral components were 43% for the Butel and 11% for the PCA. These results contrast with those of earlier experimental and clinical studies, in which isoelastic properties appeared to be advantageous. This review emphasises the importance of controlled studies before an altered or new design of prosthesis is released on to the market for general use.

On three occasions we have reviewed a series of knees after high tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis: 99 were reviewed at one to two years; 81 at a mean of 5.7 years; and 65 at a mean of 11.9 years. At one to two years and at 5.7 years over 50% were good and over 75% acceptable. At 11.9 years, 43% were good and 60% acceptable. We determined the mechanical axis through the knee in maximum varus and maximum valgus; significantly better results were found if a mean angulation of 3 degrees to 7 degrees of valgus had been achieved at operation. We also measured intercondylar distances under varus and valgus stress, and found no significant lateral compartment narrowing. The best results were seen in knees with pre-operative grade I or grade II osteoarthritis and valgus deviation after osteotomy.

Arthroscopy is now well established as a method of diagnosing meniscal lesions, and its advantages have been pointed out in several reports. Arthroscopic surgery, however, is difficult to master, so that for meniscectomy open methods remain commoner. By taking advantage of the new instruments and equipment developed for arthroscopic operations, a modified technique of open meniscectomy, designed to improve the postoperative course, has been developed. In a prospective randomised study, the results after this modified open meniscectomy were comparable with those obtained after arthroscopic operation and were significantly better than those after conventional meniscectomy. The best results of all, however, were those after partial arthroscopic meniscectomy.