header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 85-B, Issue 7 | Pages 1085 - 1085
1 Sep 2003
BUTT WP WALKOWIAK J


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 84-B, Issue 6 | Pages 781 - 782
1 Aug 2002
Butt WP Walkowiak J


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 51-B, Issue 2 | Pages 225 - 237
1 May 1969
Simmons EH Bhalla SK Butt WP

1. A series of 154 patients who underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion has been studied. A detailed analysis of the first eighty-four patients who have been observed for periods of from one to eight and a half years is described. In sixty-eight patients the fusion was done with a keystone type of graft, in seventeen by a dowel (Cloward) graft.

2. Despite a preponderance of multiple level fusions in the keystone series, clinically better results (80·8 per cent excellent or good) were found in this group than in the dowel group (64·8 per cent excellent or good).

3. A biomechanical study has indicated the keystone graft to be more stable than a dowel graft under flexion and extension strains as well as lateral bending strain. The graft is more stable the closer it is to the line of "zero velocity."

4. The three cases of non-union all occurred in the dowel group. The high incidence of fusion with the keystone technique is considered to be related to the type of graft, its method of seating, its depth of penetration, its larger surface area and the fact that raw cancellous bone of the adjacent vertebral bodies is in contact with the graft above and below.