Benefits of early stabilization of femoral shaft fractures, in mitigation of pulmonary and other complications, have been recognized over the past decades. Investigation into the appropriate level of resuscitation, and other measures of readiness for definitive fixation, versus a damage control strategy have been ongoing. These principles are now being applied to fractures of the thoracolumbar spine, pelvis, and acetabulum. Systems of trauma care are evolving to encompass attention to expeditious and safe management of not only multiply injured patients with these major fractures, but also definitive care for hip and periprosthetic fractures, which pose a similar burden of patient recumbency until stabilized. Future directions regarding refinement of patient resuscitation, assessment, and treatment are anticipated, as is the potential for data sharing and registries in enhancing trauma system functionality. Cite this article:
The best time for definitive orthopaedic care is often unclear
in patients with multiple injuries. The objective of this study
was make a prospective assessment of the safety of our early appropriate
care (EAC) strategy and to evaluate the potential benefit of additional
laboratory data to determine readiness for surgery. A cohort of 335 patients with fractures of the pelvis, acetabulum,
femur, or spine were included. Patients underwent definitive fixation
within 36 hours if one of the following three parameters were met:
lactate <
4.0 mmol/L; pH ≥ 7.25; or base excess (BE) ≥ -5.5 mmol/L.
If all three parameters were met, resuscitation was designated full
protocol resuscitation (FPR). If less than all three parameters
were met, it was designated an incomplete protocol resuscitation
(IPR). Complications were assessed by an independent adjudication
committee and included infection; sepsis; PE/DVT; organ failure;
pneumonia, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Aims
Patients and Methods
