Total hip and total knee arthroplasty both provide a considerable improvement in quality of life, but there is no evidence to suggest that one is more successful than the other. We studied 72 patients in a prospective trial before and after total hip or total knee replacement. We recorded scores for disability and distress derived from the Harris hip score and the British Orthopaedic Association knee assessment score, and used them to generate quality of life (QoL) scores using the Rosser Index Matrix immediately before and at one year after surgery.

The patients awaiting knee replacement had significantly lower QoL scores than those awaiting hip replacement (p = 0.011). The QoL scores at one year were high and almost identical for both groups (p = 0.46). Further analysis showed that gender and weight were not significant predictors of improvement of QoL scores, but age (p = 0.03) and whether the hip or knee was replaced (p = 0.006) were significant factors.

In a prospective trial we studied 176 consecutive patients having a primary total hip arthroplasty to compare the quality of life before and after operation in non-obese and obese groups. We used a modified Harris hip score and the Rosser Index Matrix to generate these scores, and found that the median preoperative quality of life score for both groups was similar.

During review, both groups showed a corresponding marked improvement in quality of life scores at one and three years. There was no statistically significant difference in the improvement in scores between the non-obese and obese groups. It appears that relative body-weight on its own does not influence the benefit derived from primary total hip arthroplasty.