To compare the in vivo long-term fixation achieved by two acetabular components with different porous ingrowth surfaces using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). This was a minimum ten-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial of 62 hips with two different porous ingrowth acetabular components. RSA exams had previously been acquired through two years of follow-up. Patients returned for RSA examination at a minimum of ten years. In addition, radiological appearance of these acetabular components was analyzed, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) obtained.Aims
Methods
The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term results
of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in young patients using
either a conventional (CPE) or a highly cross-linked (HXLPE) polyethylene
liner in terms of functional outcome, incidence of osteolysis, radiological
wear and rate of revision. We included all patients between the ages of 45 and 65 years
who, between January 2000 and December 2001, had undergone a primary
THA for osteoarthritis at our hospital using a CPE or HXLPE acetabular
liner and a 28 mm cobalt-chrome femoral head. From a total of 160 patients, 158 (177 hips) were available for
review (CPE 89; XLPE 88). The mean age, body mass index (BMI) and
follow-up in each group were: CPE: 56.8 years (46 to 65); 30.7 kg/m2 (19
to 58); 13.2 years (2.1 to 14.7) and HXLPE: 55.6 years (45 to 65);
BMI: 30 kg/m2 (18 to 51); 13.1 years (5.7 to 14.4).Aims
Methods
This was a randomised controlled trial studying
the safety of a new short metaphyseal fixation (SMF) stem. We hypothesised
that it would have similar early clinical results and micromovement
to those of a standard-length tapered Synergy metaphyseal fixation
stem. Using radiostereometric analysis (RSA) we compared the two
stems in 43 patients. A short metaphyseal fixation stem was used
in 22 patients and a Synergy stem in 21 patients. No difference
was found in the clinical outcomes pre- or post-operatively between
groups. RSA showed no significant differences two years post-operatively
in mean micromovement between the two stems (except for varus/valgus tilt
at p = 0.05) (subsidence 0.94 mm ( Cite this article:
The purpose of this study was to examine the
complications and outcomes of total hip replacement (THR) in super-obese
patients (body mass index (BMI) >
50 kg/m2) compared
with class I obese (BMI 30 to 34.9 kg/m2) and normal-weight
patients (BMI 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2), as defined by the
World Health Organization. A total of 39 THRs were performed in 30 super-obese patients
with a mean age of 53 years (31 to 72), who were followed for a
mean of 4.2 years (2.0 to 11.7). This group was matched with two
cohorts of normal-weight and class I obese patients, each comprising
39 THRs in 39 patients. Statistical analysis was performed to determine differences
among these groups with respect to complications and satisfaction
based on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis
index, the Harris hip score (HHS) and the Short-Form (SF)-12 questionnaire. Super-obese patients experienced significantly longer hospital
stays and higher rates of major complications and readmissions than
normal-weight and class I obese patients. Although super-obese patients
demonstrated reduced pre-operative and post-operative satisfaction
scores, there was no significant difference in improvement, or change in
the score, with respect to HHS or the WOMAC osteoarthritis index. Super-obese patients obtain similar satisfaction outcomes as
class I obese and normal-weight patients with respect to improvement
in their scores. However, they experience a significant increase
in length of hospital stay and major complication and readmission
rates. Cite this article:
