We evaluated the top 13 journals in trauma and
orthopaedics by impact factor and looked at the longer-term effect regarding
citations of their papers. All 4951 papers published in these journals during 2007 and 2008
were reviewed and categorised by their type, subspecialty and super-specialty.
All citations indexed through Google Scholar were reviewed to establish
the rate of citation per paper at two, four and five years post-publication.
The top five journals published a total of 1986 papers. Only three
(0.15%) were on operative orthopaedic surgery and none were on trauma.
Most (n = 1084, 54.5%) were about experimental basic science. Surgical
papers had a lower rate of citation (2.18) at two years than basic science
or clinical medical papers (4.68). However, by four years the rates
were similar (26.57 for surgery, 30.35 for basic science/medical),
which suggests that there is a considerable time lag before clinical
surgical research has an impact. We conclude that high impact journals do not address clinical
research in surgery and when they do, there is a delay before such
papers are cited. We suggest that a rate of citation at five years
post-publication might be a more appropriate indicator of importance
for papers in our specialty. Cite this article:
The most frequent cause of failure after total
hip replacement in all reported arthroplasty registries is peri-prosthetic
osteolysis. Osteolysis is an active biological process initiated
in response to wear debris. The eventual response to this process
is the activation of macrophages and loss of bone. Activation of macrophages initiates a complex biological cascade
resulting in the final common pathway of an increase in osteolytic
activity. The biological initiators, mechanisms for and regulation
of this process are beginning to be understood. This article explores current
concepts in the causes of, and underlying biological mechanism resulting
in peri-prosthetic osteolysis, reviewing the current basic science
and clinical literature surrounding the topic.
