From 1970 to 1980 cemented metal-on-plastic total hip replacement was performed on 799 hips with primary osteoarthritis using one surgical technique. At the 10- to 20-year follow-up there had been 97 revisions for mechanical loosening. Univariate survivorship analysis showed that an increased risk of revision was associated with male gender, young age at primary THR, the Brunswik and Lubinus snap-fit prostheses with large femoral heads (as compared with the Charnley prosthesis), and varying experience of the surgeon. Multivariate statistical analysis showed a three-fold increased risk of revision for men (p < 0.0001), an increase in relative risk of 1.8 per 10 years younger at surgery (p < 0.0001), a fivefold increase in risk for the Brunswik prosthesis (p < 0.0001) and a twofold increase for the Lubinus prosthesis (p = 0.0067). Inexperience of the surgeon, however, was not validated as a risk factor. The study shows that the true risk factors for revision can be identified accurately by combining univariate survivorship and multivariate statistical analyses.

We made a study of 49 total hip arthroplasties at five years, comparing the Charnley hip score, the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) score and the appearance on serial radiographs. Each of the three investigations was performed by an independent observer with no knowledge of the results of the other two studies. The eight patients with radiographic signs of prosthetic loosening had significant reductions in function and quality of life as measured by the NHP questionnaire, but no differences in the mean Charnley hip scores. None of the eight patients had clinical signs of prosthetic loosening sufficient to recommend revision of their THR. The NHP is a relatively low-cost method of providing long-term follow-up of THR.

We studied the rate of revision in 84 consecutive total hip replacements performed for failed osteosynthesis of femoral neck fractures and compared it with that for primary arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. The age and sex adjusted risk of prosthetic failure was 2.5 times higher after failure of fixation, but all the excess risk was in patients over 70 years of age. There were radiographic signs of loosening of the femoral component at five to 12 years after secondary arthroplasty in six of 33 survivors. In general, the results of secondary replacement were no worse than those obtained after primary arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture. We consider that internal fixation should be the primary procedure: total hip replacement is a safe secondary procedure when osteosynthesis fails.

Computed tomography was performed on 40 patients with recent hip trauma. Radiographs of 25 showed a fracture of the femoral neck with slight displacement; 24 of these had intra-articular fluid and 20 had a lipohaemarthrosis on the CT scan. In 15 patients, radiographs at the time of admission were normal but suspicion of fracture remained. A fracture was later verified in five patients, four of whom had lipohaemarthrosis on admission. In the remaining 10 patients no fracture could be detected; only one patient had a hip joint effusion but no free fat. Thus all 24 patients with lipohaemarthrosis had an intracapsular fracture of the hip. We suggest CT for patients with hip trauma and negative radiographs. The presence of a lipohaemarthrosis of the hip strongly suggests an intra-articular fracture of either the femoral neck or the acetabulum.

We report a series of 640 consecutive cervical hip fractures which were followed prospectively for two years after primary internal fixation with two hook-pins. Secondary arthroplasties were performed as salvage procedures in 75 cases and the early outcome of these was studied retrospectively. The mean time in hospital was 25 days for prosthetic replacement, though 60% of the patients had other medical conditions considered as risk factors. Mortality was 5% after six months and 8% after one year. Dislocation was seen in 11% and additional surgery was required in 4%. There was one case of deep infection and one supracondylar femoral fracture. In some cases there was considerable delay between the primary and secondary operation due to lack of awareness of functional deterioration, but although many patients had poor mobility before the secondary operation this was greatly improved within six weeks of the arthroplasty. We conclude that elective secondary hip arthroplasty for failure of fracture fixation is a safe and successful procedure. Once the decision to perform an arthroplasty is taken, this should be done without delay to avoid deterioration of function.

We studied intracapsular pressure in 50 patients with Garden Grade I and II subcapital fractures. Before operation pressures varied from zero to 320 mmHg, 16 patients having an intracapsular pressure of over 80 mmHg. The pressure was increased considerably by medial rotation and decreased by lateral rotation and especially by semi-flexion. From zero to 36 ml of blood was aspirated; the amount did not correlate with the intracapsular pressure. Of 25 patients who were also examined by scintimetry, 13 had reduced uptake at the femoral head before aspiration, and nine of these showed a marked increase in uptake after aspiration. Intracapsular tamponade of the hip may be one reason for the occasional occurrence of segmental collapse of the femoral head after subcapital fracture with minor displacement.