The presence of facet tropism has been correlated with an elevated susceptibility to lumbar disc pathology. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of facet tropism on chronic lumbosacral discogenic pain through the analysis of clinical data and finite element modelling (FEM). Retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data, with a specific focus on the spinal units displaying facet tropism, utilizing FEM analysis for motion simulation. We studied 318 intervertebral levels in 156 patients who had undergone provocation discography. Significant predictors of clinical findings were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. Loading conditions were applied in FEM simulations to mimic biomechanical effects on intervertebral discs, focusing on maximal displacement and intradiscal pressures, gauged through alterations in disc morphology and physical stress.Aims
Methods
We performed a prospective study to examine the
influence of the patient’s position on the location of the abdominal
organs, to investigate the possibility of a true lateral approach
for transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Pre-operative abdominal
CT scans were taken in 20 patients who underwent endoscopic lumbar discectomy.
Axial images in parallel planes of each intervertebral disc from
L1 to L5 were achieved in both supine and prone positions. The most
horizontal approach angles possible to avoid injury to the abdominal
organs were measured. The results demonstrated that the safe approach
angles were significantly less (i.e., more horizontal) in the prone
than in the supine position. Obstacles to a more lateral approach
were mainly the liver, the spleen and the kidneys at L1/2 (39 of
40, 97.5%) and L2/3 (28 of 40, 70.0%), and the intestines at L3/4
(33 of 40, 82.5%) and L4/5 (30 of 30, 100%). A true lateral approach
from each side was possible for 30 of the 40 discs at L3/4 (75%)
and 23 of the 30 discs at L4/5 (76.7%). We concluded that a more
horizontal approach for transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy
is possible in the prone position but not in the supine. Prone abdominal
CT is more helpful in determining the trajectory of the endoscope.
While a true lateral approach is feasible in many patients, our
study shows it is not universally applicable.