The number of revision total ankle arthroplasties (TAAs) which are undertaken is increasing. Few studies have reported the survival after this procedure. The primary aim of this study was to analyze the survival of revision ankle arthroplasties using large datasets. Secondary aims were to summarize the demographics of the patients, the indications for revision TAA, further operations, and predictors of survival. The study combined data from the National Joint Registry and NHS Digital to report the survival of revision TAA. We have previously reported the failure rates and risk factors for failure after TAA, and the outcome of fusion after a failed TAA, using the same methodology. Survival was assessed using life tables and Kaplan Meier graphs. Cox proportional hazards regression models were fitted to compare failure rates.Aims
Methods
When a total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) fails, it can be converted to a fusion or a revision arthroplasty. Despite the increasing numbers of TAAs being undertaken, there is little information in the literature about the management of patients undergoing fusion following a failed TAA. The primary aim of this study was to analyze the survival of fusions following a failed TAA using a large dataset from the National Joint Registry (NJR). A data linkage study combined NJR and NHS Digital data. Failure of a TAA was defined as a fusion, revision to a further TAA, or amputation. Life tables and Kaplan-Meier graphs were used to record survival. Cox proportional hazards regression models were fitted to compare the rates of failure.Aims
Methods
Despite the increasing numbers of ankle arthroplasties, there are limited studies on their survival and comparisons between different implants. The primary aim of this study was to determine the failure rates of primary ankle arthroplasties commonly used in the UK. A data linkage study combined National Joint Registry (NJR) data and NHS Digital data. The primary outcome of failure was defined as the removal or exchange of any components of the implanted device. Life tables and Kaplan-Meier survival charts were used to illustrate survivorship. Cox proportional hazards regression models were fitted to compare failure rates between 1 April 2010 and 31 December 2018.Aims
Methods
Revision rates for ankle arthroplasties are higher than hip or knee arthroplasties. When a total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) fails, it can either undergo revision to another ankle replacement, revision of the TAA to ankle arthrodesis (fusion), or amputation. Currently there is a paucity of literature on the outcomes of these revisions. The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the outcomes of revision TAA with respect to surgery type, functional outcomes, and reoperations. A systematic review was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cinahl, and Cochrane reviews were searched for relevant papers. Papers analyzing surgical treatment for failed ankle arthroplasties were included. All papers were reviewed by two authors. Overall, 34 papers met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of fibula non-union in patients undergoing distraction osteogenesis, and the incidence of symptoms following this. A consecutive series of 58 patients undergoing distraction osteogenesis at a tertiary centre under a single surgeon were included. Data was collected prospectively. Plain radiographs were reviewed retrospectively by a blinded reviewer. Union was defined as the presence of bridging callous on two views. There were 58 distraction procedures performed. The mean age was 37.2 years (range 16.0 to 80.6). There were 36 males and 22 females. The mean follow-up was 23.4 months (4–70 months) 9 (15.5%) went onto non-union at frame removal. 3 (33.3%) of the 9 fibulas that did not unite developed symptoms. 2 (66.7%) of these required surgery in the form of fibula plating. Both of these patient's symptoms resolved following surgery. 3 (33.3%) of the 9 non-united fibulas also had tibial non-union compared to 1 of the 49 where the fibula united. There was no association between location of fibula osteotomy and development of non-union. 35 fibula osteotomies were performed in the third quarter. Of the fibulas that united, the mean fibula lengthening was 9.25 mm (range 1.2–27.8 mm). In the fibulas that went onto non-union the mean lengthening was 23.66 mm (range 5.1–51.5 mm) (P = 0.004). 54 (93.1%) of the tibias united following osteotomy and distraction, whilst 4 (6.9%) went onto non-union requiring operative treatment. Of the 4 tibias that did not unite, 3 (75%) also had fibula non-union (P = 0.01). Fibula non-union is a relatively common complication following osteotomy in distraction osteogenesis. The length of fibula distraction and tibia non-union are significant risk factors for the development of a fibula non-union. We recommend surgical intervention for those patients who have symptomatic fibula non-unions.
