We have previously reported the mid-term outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for flexion instability. At a mean of four years, there were no re-revisions for instability. The aim of this study was to report the implant survivorship and clinical and radiological outcomes of the same cohort of of patients at a mean follow-up of ten years. The original publication included 60 revision TKAs in 60 patients which were undertaken between 2000 and 2010. The mean age of the patients at the time of revision TKA was 65 years, and 33 (55%) were female. Since that time, 21 patients died, leaving 39 patients (65%) available for analysis. The cumulative incidence of any re-revision with death as a competing risk was calculated. Knee Society Scores (KSSs) were also recorded, and updated radiographs were reviewed.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to compare ten-year longitudinal healthcare costs and revision rates for patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The Humana database was used to compare 2,383 patients undergoing UKA between 2007 and 2009, who were matched 1:1 from a cohort of 63,036 patients undergoing primary TKA based on age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Medical and surgical complications were tracked longitudinally for one year following surgery. Rates of revision surgery and cumulative mean healthcare costs were recorded for this period of time and compared between the cohorts.Aims
Methods
Osteochondral lesions (OCLs) occur in up to 70%
of sprains and fractures involving the ankle. Atraumatic aetiologies have
also been described. Techniques such as microfracture, and replacement
strategies such as autologous osteochondral transplantation, or
autologous chondrocyte implantation are the major forms of surgical
treatment. Current literature suggests that microfracture is indicated
for lesions up to 15 mm in diameter, with replacement strategies
indicated for larger or cystic lesions. Short- and medium-term results
have been reported, where concerns over potential deterioration
of fibrocartilage leads to a need for long-term evaluation. Biological augmentation may also be used in the treatment of
OCLs, as they potentially enhance the biological environment for
a natural healing response. Further research is required to establish
the critical size of defect, beyond which replacement strategies
should be used, as well as the most appropriate use of biological augmentation.
This paper reviews the current evidence for surgical management
and use of biological adjuncts for treatment of osteochondral lesions
of the talus. Cite this article:
