To investigate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of older adults (aged ≥ 60 years) after tibial plateau fracture (TPF) compared to preinjury and population matched values, and what aspects of treatment were most important to patients. We undertook a retrospective, case-control study of 67 patients at mean 3.5 years (SD 1.3; 1.3 to 6.1) after TPF (47 patients underwent fixation, and 20 nonoperative management). Patients completed EuroQol five-dimension three-level (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire, Lower Limb Function Scale (LEFS), and Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) for current and recalled prefracture status. Propensity score matching for age, sex, and deprivation in a 1:5 ratio was performed using patient level data from the Health Survey for England to obtain a control group for HRQoL comparison. The primary outcome was the difference in actual (TPF cohort) and expected (matched control) EQ-5D-3L score after TPF.Aims
Methods
The aims of this study were to establish whether composite fixation
(rail-plate) decreases fixator time and related problems in the
management of patients with infected nonunion of tibia with a segmental
defect, without compromising the anatomical and functional outcomes
achieved using the classical Ilizarov technique. We also wished
to study the acceptability of this technique using patient-based
objective criteria. Between January 2012 and January 2015, 14 consecutive patients
were treated for an infected nonunion of the tibia with a gap and
were included in the study. During stage one, a radical debridement
of bone and soft tissue was undertaken with the introduction of
an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer. At the second stage, the tibia
was stabilized using a long lateral locked plate and a six-pin monorail
fixator on its anteromedial surface. A corticotomy was performed
at the appropriate level. During the third stage, i.e. at the end
of the distraction phase, the transported fragment was aligned and
fixed to the plate with two to four screws. An iliac crest autograft
was added to the docking site and the fixator was removed. Functional
outcome was assessed using the Association for the Study and Application
of Methods of Ilizarov (ASAMI) criteria. Patient-reported outcomes
were assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score.Aims
Patients and Methods
