This study aimed to describe the use of revision knee arthroplasty in Australia and examine changes in lifetime risk over a decade. De-identified individual-level data on all revision knee arthroplasties performed in Australia from 2007 to 2017 were obtained from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Population data and life tables were obtained from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The lifetime risk of revision surgery was calculated for each year using a standardized formula. Separate calculations were undertaken for males and females.Aims
Methods
We assessed the outcome of patients who were
lost to follow-up after arthroplasty by a single surgeon. The aim was
to validate the surgeon’s data set with the Australian Orthopaedic
Association National Joint Replacement Registry and determine the
outcome of those patients lost to follow-up. Prospective data on patient demographics, operative details and
outcomes of the surgeon’s 1192 primary unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
(UKA) procedures were analysed. There were 69 knees in patients
who were lost to follow-up, among whom the Registry identified 31
deaths and eight revisions. The cumulative percentage revision (CPR) at seven years using
the additional Registry data was 8.8% (95% confidence interval (CI)
7 to 11). Using the surgeon’s data, the CPR at seven years was 8%
(95% CI 6.3 to 10.1) for the best-case scenario where loss to follow-up
was excluded, and 16% (95% CI 13.8 to 19.4) for the worst-case scenario, where
all patients lost to follow-up were deemed to have been revised.
There was a significantly higher mortality rate in those patients
lost to follow-up. This study demonstrates that a national joint registry can be
used by individual surgeons to establish more accurate revision
rates in their arthroplasty patients. This is expected to facilitate
a more rigorous audit of surgical outcomes by surgeons and lead
to more accurate and uniform reporting of the results of arthroplasty
in general.
