Joint replacement of the hip and knee remain
very satisfactory operations. They are, however, expensive. The
actual manufacturing of the implant represents only 30% of the final
cost, while sales and marketing represent 40%. Recently, the patents
on many well established and successful implants have expired. Companies
have started producing and distributing implants that purport to
replicate existing implants with good long-term results. The aims of this paper are to assess the legality, the monitoring
and cost saving implications of such generic implants. We also assess
how this might affect the traditional orthopaedic implant companies. Cite this article:
Reported rates of dislocation in hip hemiarthroplasty
(HA) for the treatment of intra-capsular fractures of the hip, range
between 1% and 10%. HA is frequently performed through a direct
lateral surgical approach. The aim of this study is to determine
the contribution of the anterior capsule to the stability of a cemented
HA through a direct lateral approach. A total of five whole-body cadavers were thawed at room temperature,
providing ten hip joints for investigation. A Thompson HA was cemented
in place via a direct lateral approach. The cadavers were then positioned
supine, both knee joints were disarticulated and a digital torque
wrench was attached to the femur using a circular frame with three
half pins. The wrench applied an external rotation force with the
hip in extension to allow the hip to dislocate anteriorly. Each
hip was dislocated twice; once with a capsular repair and once without
repairing the capsule. Stratified sampling ensured the order in
which this was performed was alternated for the paired hips on each
cadaver. Comparing peak torque force in hips with the capsule repaired
and peak torque force in hips without repair of the capsule, revealed
a significant difference between the ‘capsule repaired’ (mean 22.96
Nm, standard deviation ( Cite this article: