The restoration of knee alignment is an important
goal during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In the past surgeons aimed
to restore neutral limb alignment during surgery. However, previous
studies have demonstrated alignment to be dynamic, varying depending
on the position of the limb and the degree of weight-bearing, and
between patients. We used a validated computer navigation system
to measure the femorotibial mechanical angle (FTMA) in 264 knees in
77 male and 55 female healthy volunteers aged 18 to 35 years (mean
26.2). We found the mean supine alignment to be a varus angle of
1.2° (standard deviation ( Knee alignment is different in different individuals and is dynamic
in nature, changing with different postures. This may have implications
for the assessment of alignment in TKA, which is achieved in non-weight-bearing conditions
and which may not represent the situation observed during weight-bearing. Cite this article:
Acetabular component orientation in total hip arthroplasty (THA)
influences results. Intra-operatively, the natural arthritic acetabulum
is often used as a reference to position the acetabular component.
Detailed information regarding its orientation is therefore essential. The
aim of this study was to identify the acetabular inclination and
anteversion in arthritic hips. Acetabular inclination and anteversion in 65 symptomatic arthritic
hips requiring THA were measured using a computer navigation system.
All patients were Caucasian with primary osteoarthritis (29 men,
36 women). The mean age was 68 years (SD 8). Mean inclination was
50.5° (SD 7.8) in men and 52.1° (SD 6.7) in women. Mean anteversion
was 8.3° (SD 8.7) in men and 14.4° (SD 11.6) in women. Objectives
Methods
We compared lower limb coronal alignment measurements
obtained pre- and post-operatively with long-leg radiographs and
computer navigation in patients undergoing primary total knee replacement
(TKR). A series of 185 patients had their pre- and post-implant
radiological and computer-navigation system measurements of coronal alignment
compared using the Bland-Altman method. The study included 81 men
and 104 women with a mean age of 68.5 years (32 to 87) and a mean
body mass index of 31.7 kg/m2 (19 to 49). Pre-implant
Bland–Altman limits of agreement were -9.4° to 8.6° with a repeatability
coefficient of 9.0°. The Bland–Altman plot showed a tendency for the
radiological measurement to indicate a higher level of pre-operative
deformity than the corresponding navigation measurement. Post-implant
limits of agreement were -5.0° to 5.4° with a repeatability coefficient
of 5.2°. The tendency for valgus knees to have greater deformity
on the radiograph was still seen, but was weaker for varus knees. The alignment seen or measured intra-operatively during TKR is
not necessarily the same as the deformity seen on a standing long-leg
radiograph either pre- or post-operatively. Further investigation
into the effect of weight-bearing and surgical exposure of the joint
on the mechanical femorotibial angle is required to enable the most appropriate
intra-operative alignment to be selected.
There have been many reports which suggest that in patients with tibiofemoral osteoarthritis, a reduction in joint space is demonstrated better on weight-bearing radiographs taken with the knee in semiflexion than in full extension. The reduction has been attributed to the loss of articular cartilage in the contact area in a semiflexed arthritic knee. None of these studies have, however, included normal knees. We have therefore undertaken a prospective, double-blind, randomised study in order to evaluate the difference in the joint-space of arthroscopically-proven normal tibiofemoral joints as seen on weight-bearing full-extension and 30° flexion posteroanterior radiographs. Twenty-two knees were evaluated and the results showed that there may be a difference of up to 2 mm in the two views. This difference could be attributed to the inherent differential thickness of the articular cartilage in different areas of the femoral and tibial condyles and a change in the areas of contact between them.
