The best surgical strategy for the management of displaced bucket-handle (BH) meniscal tears in an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knee is unclear. Combining meniscal repair with ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is thought to improve meniscal healing rates; however, patients with displaced BH meniscal tears may lack extension. This leads some to advocate staged surgery to avoid postoperative stiffness and loss of range of motion (ROM) following ACLR. We reviewed the data for a consecutive series of 88 patients (mean age 27.1 years (15 to 49); 65 male (74%) and 23 female (26%)) who underwent single-stage repair of a displaced BH meniscal tear (67 medial (76%) and 21 lateral (24%)) with concomitant hamstring autograft ACLR. The patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS), EuroQol five-dimension health questionnaire (EQ-5D), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee score (IKDC), and Tegner score were recorded at final follow-up. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to estimate meniscal repair survivorship. Analyses were performed with different cut-offs for meniscal and ACL injury-to-surgery time (within three weeks, three to ten weeks, and more than ten weeks).Aims
Methods
We have previously shown that prior exposure of rat hind limbs to ischaemia for five minutes and reperfusion for five minutes reduced the structural damage to skeletal muscle which followed a subsequent period of ischaemia for four hours and reperfusion for one hour. We have now examined the potential mechanisms by which this ischaemic preconditioning protocol may be effective in reducing damage to skeletal muscle induced by prolonged ischaemia and reperfusion. Prior exposure of the hindlimb to ischaemia for five minutes and reperfusion for five minutes did not prevent the fall in the ATP content of tibialis anterior which occurred after a subsequent period of ischaemia for four hours and reperfusion for one hour. Similarly, no effect of the preconditioning protocol was seen on the elevated muscle myeloperoxidase, indicative of an elevated neutrophil content, or abnormal muscle cation content. Reperfused ischaemic muscle was also found to have an increased content of heat-shock protein (HSP) 72, but the preconditioning protocol did not further increase the content of this or other HSPs indicating that it was not acting by increasing the expression of these cytoprotective proteins. The protective effects of preconditioning appeared to be mimicked by the infusion of adenosine to animals immediately before exposure to the four-hour period, indicating a potential mechanism by which skeletal muscle may be preconditioned to maintain structural viability.
Ischaemic preconditioning is a process by which exposure of a tissue to a short period of non-damaging ischaemic stress leads to resistance to the deleterious effects of a subsequent prolonged ischaemic stress. It has been extensively described in the heart, but few studies have examined the possibility that it can occur in skeletal muscle. We have used a rat model of ischaemia of one limb to examine this possibility. Exposure of the hind limb to a period of ischaemia of five minutes and reperfusion for five minutes significantly protected the tibialis anterior muscle against the structural damage induced by a subsequent period of limb ischaemia for four hours and reperfusion for one hour. This protection was evident on examination of the muscle by both light and electron microscopy. Longer or shorter times of prior ischaemia had no effect.
