Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a very successful and cost-effective operation, yet debate continues about the optimum fixation philosophy in different age groups. The concept of the 'cementless paradox' and the UK 'Getting it Right First Time' initiative encourage increased use of cemented fixation due to purported lower revision rates, especially in elderly patients, and decreased cost. In a high-volume, tertiary referral centre, we identified 10,112 THAs from a prospectively collected database, including 1,699 cemented THAs, 5,782 hybrid THAs, and 2,631 cementless THAs. The endpoint was revision for any reason. Secondary analysis included examination of implant survivorship in patients aged over 70 years, over 75 years, and over 80 years at primary THA.Aims
Methods
Surgeons have commonly used modular femoral heads and stems from
different manufacturers, although this is not recommended by orthopaedic
companies due to the different manufacturing processes. We compared the rate of corrosion and rate of wear at the trunnion/head
taper junction in two groups of retrieved hips; those with mixed
manufacturers (MM) and those from the same manufacturer (SM). We identified 151 retrieved hips with large-diameter cobalt-chromium
heads; 51 of two designs that had been paired with stems from different
manufacturers (MM) and 100 of seven designs paired with stems from
the same manufacturer (SM). We determined the severity of corrosion
with the Goldberg corrosion score and the volume of material loss
at the head/stem junction. We used multivariable statistical analysis
to determine if there was a significant difference between the two
groups. Aims
Materials and Methods
There are many guidelines that help direct the management of
patients with metal-on-metal (MOM) hip arthroplasties. We have undertaken
a study to compare the management of patients with MOM hip arthroplasties in
different countries. Six international tertiary referral orthopaedic centres were
invited to participate by organising a multi-disciplinary team (MDT)
meeting, consisting of two or more revision hip arthroplasty surgeons
and a musculoskeletal radiologist. A full clinical dataset including
history, blood tests and imaging for ten patients was sent to each
unit, for discussion and treatment planning. Differences in the
interpretation of findings, management decisions and rationale for
decisions were compared using quantitative and qualitative methods.Aims
Methods
