As adverse events related to metal on metal hip
arthroplasty have been better understood, there has been increased
interest in toxicity related to the high circulating levels of cobalt ions.
However, distinguishing true toxicity from benign elevations in
cobalt levels can be challenging. The purpose of this review is
to examine the use of cobalt alloys in total hip arthroplasty, to
review the methods of measuring circulating cobalt levels, to define
a level of cobalt which is considered pathological and to review
the pathophysiology, risk factors and treatment of cobalt toxicity.
To the best of our knowledge, there are 18 published cases where
cobalt metal ion toxicity has been attributed to the use of cobalt-chromium
alloys in hip arthroplasty. Of these cases, the great majority reported
systemic toxic reactions at serum cobalt levels more than 100 μg/L.
This review highlights some of the clinical features of cobalt toxicity,
with the goal that early awareness may decrease the risk factors
for the development of cobalt toxicity and/or reduce its severity. Take home message: Severe adverse events can arise from the release
of cobalt from metal-on-metal arthroplasties, and as such, orthopaedic
surgeons should not only be aware of the presenting problems, but
also have the knowledge to treat appropriately. Cite this article:
Symptomatic hip osteonecrosis is a disabling
condition with a poorly understood aetiology and pathogenesis. Numerous
treatment options for hip osteonecrosis are described, which include
non-operative management and joint preserving procedures, as well
as total hip replacement (THR). Non-operative or joint preserving
treatment may improve outcomes when an early diagnosis is made before
the lesion has become too large or there is radiographic evidence
of femoral head collapse. The presence of a crescent sign, femoral
head flattening, and acetabular involvement indicate a more advanced-stage
disease in which joint preserving options are less effective than
THR. Since many patients present after disease progression, primary
THR is often the only reliable treatment option available. Prior
to the 1990s, outcomes of THR for osteonecrosis were poor. However,
according to recent reports and systemic reviews, it is encouraging
that with the introduction of newer ceramic and/or highly cross-linked
polyethylene bearings as well as highly-porous fixation interfaces,
THR appears to be a reliable option in the management of end-stage
arthritis following hip osteonecrosis in this historically difficult
to treat patient population. Cite this article:
