The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to assess and investigate the safety and efficacy of using a distal tibial osteotomy compared to proximal osteotomy for limb lengthening in children. In this study, there were 59 consecutive tibial lengthening and deformity corrections in 57 children using a circular frame. All were performed or supervised by the senior author between January 2013 and June 2019. A total of 25 who underwent a distal tibial osteotomy were analyzed and compared to a group of 34 who had a standard proximal tibial osteotomy. For each patient, the primary diagnosis, time in frame, complications, and lengthening achieved were recorded. From these data, the frame index was calculated (days/cm) and analyzed.Aims
Methods
This observational study examines the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic upon the paediatric trauma burden of a district general hospital. We aim to compare the nature and volume of the paediatric trauma during the first 2020 UK lockdown period with the same period in 2019. Prospective data was collected from 23 March 2020 to 14 June 2020 and compared with retrospective data collected from 23 March 2019 to 14 June 2019. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, nature of the injury, and details of any surgery were tabulated and statistically analyzed using the independent-samples Aims
Methods
The traditional techniques involving an oblique
tunnel or triangular wedge resection to approach a central or mixed-type
physeal bar are hindered by poor visualisation of the bar. This
may be overcome by a complete transverse osteotomy at the metaphysis
near the growth plate or a direct vertical approach to the bar.
Ilizarov external fixation using small wires allows firm fixation
of the short physis-bearing fragment, and can also correct an associated angular
deformity and permit limb lengthening. We accurately approached and successfully excised ten central-
or mixed-type bars; six in the distal femur, two in the proximal
tibia and two in the distal tibia, without damaging the uninvolved
physis, and corrected the associated angular deformity and leg-length
discrepancy. Callus formation was slightly delayed because of periosteal
elevation and stretching during resection of the bar. The resultant
resection of the bar was satisfactory in seven patients and fair
in three as assessed using a by a modified Williamson–Staheli classification. Cite this article:
