Metatarsus primus varus deformity correction
is one of the main objectives in
Aims. The purpose of this study is to examine the adductus impact on the second metatarsal by the nonosteotomy nonarthrodesis syndesmosis procedure for the
As it remains unproven that hypermobility of
the first tarsometatarsal joint (TMTJ-1) is a significant factor
in
Introduction. The aetiology of
We reviewed 91 patients (103 feet) who underwent
a Ludloff osteotomy combined with additional procedures. According
to the combined procedures performed, patients were divided into
Group I (31 feet; first web space release), Group II (35 feet; Akin
osteotomy and trans-articular release), or Group III (37 feet; Akin
osteotomy, supplementary axial Kirschner (K-) wire fixation, and
trans-articular release). Each group was then further subdivided
into severe and moderate deformities. The mean
There are few data available regarding the association between
We reviewed the outcome of distal chevron metatarsal osteotomy without tendon transfer in 19 consecutive patients (19 feet) with a hallux varus deformity following surgery for
Moderate to severe
Severe
The purpose of this study was to compare the
results of proximal and distal chevron osteotomy in patients with moderate
hallux valgus. We retrospectively reviewed 34 proximal chevron osteotomies without
lateral release (PCO group) and 33 distal chevron osteotomies (DCO
group) performed sequentially by a single surgeon. There were no
differences between the groups with regard to age, length of follow-up,
demographic or radiological parameters. The clinical results were
assessed using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS)
scoring system and the radiological results were compared between
the groups. At a mean follow-up of 14.6 months (14 to 32) there were no significant
differences in the mean AOFAS scores between the DCO and PCO groups
(93.9 (82 to 100) and 91.8 (77 to 100), respectively; p = 0.176).
The mean
Metatarsalgia is a recognised complication following iatrogenic shortening of the first metatarsal in the management of
Aims. The purpose of this study was to analyse the biomechanics of
walking, through the ground reaction forces (GRF) measured, after
first metatarsal osteotomy or metatarsophalangeal joint (MTP) arthrodesis. Patients and Methods. A total of 19 patients underwent a Scarf osteotomy (50.3 years,
standard deviation (. sd. ) 12.3) and 18 underwent an arthrodesis
(56.2 years,. sd. 6.5). Clinical and radiographical data
as well as the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS)
scores were determined. GRF were measured using an instrumented
treadmill. A two-way model of analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used
to determine the effects of surgery on biomechanical parameters
of walking, particularly propulsion. Results. Epidemiological, radiographical and clinical data were comparable
in the two groups and better restoration of propulsive function
was found after osteotomy as shown by ANOVA (two way: surgery ×
foot) with a surgery effect on vertical forces (p <
0.01) and
a foot effect on anteroposterior impulse (p = 0.01). Conclusion. Patients who underwent Scarf osteotomy had a gait pattern similar
to that of their non-operated foot, whereas those who underwent
arthrodesis of the first (metatarsophalangeal) MTP joint did not
totally recover the propulsive forces of the forefoot. Take home message: The main findings of this study were that
after surgical correction for
Aims. The Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOxFQ) is an anatomically specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) currently used to assess a wide variety of foot and ankle pathology. It consists of 16 items across three subscales measuring distinct but related traits: walking/standing ability, pain, and social interaction. It is the most used foot and ankle PROM in the UK. Initial MOxFQ validation involved analysis of 100 individuals undergoing
This study sought to determine the medium-term
patient-reported and radiographic outcomes in patients undergoing
surgery for
Aims. The aim of this study was to report a single surgeon series of
consecutive patients with moderate
Aims. The mainstay of surgical correction of
Proximal osteotomies for forefoot deformity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis have hitherto not been described. We evaluated combination joint-preserving surgery involving three different proximal osteotomies for such deformities. A total of 30 patients (39 feet) with a mean age of 55.6 years (45 to 67) underwent combined first tarsometatarsal fusion and distal realignment, shortening oblique osteotomies of the bases of the second to fourth metatarsals and a fifth-ray osteotomy. The mean follow-up was 36 months (24 to 68). The mean foot function index scores for pain, disability and activity subscales were 18, 23, and 16 respectively. The mean Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot score improved significantly from 52.2 (41 to 68) to 89.6 (78 to 97). Post-operatively, 14 patients had forefoot stiffness, but had no disability. Most patients reported highly satisfactory walking ability. Residual deformity and callosities were absent. The mean
The Cartiva synthetic cartilage implant (SCI) entered mainstream use in the management of first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthritis following the positive results of large trials in 2016. Limited information is available on the longer-term outcomes of this implant within the literature, particularly when independent from the originator. This single-centre cohort study investigates the efficacy of the Cartiva SCI at up to five years. First MTPJ arthritis was radiologically graded according to the Hattrup and Johnson (HJ) classification. Preoperative and sequential postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were evaluated using the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), and the activities of daily living (ADL) sub-section of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM).Aims
Methods
Implant failure has become more common as the number of primary total ankle arthroplasties (TAAs) performed has increased. Although revision arthroplasty has gained attention for functional preservation, the long-term results remain unclear. This study aimed to assess the long-term outcomes of revision TAA using a mobile-bearing prosthesis in a considerably large cohort; the risk factors for failure were also determined. This single-centre retrospective cohort study included 116 patients (117 ankles) who underwent revision TAA for failed primary TAA between July 2000 and March 2010. Survival analysis and risk factor assessment were performed, and clinical performance and patient satisfaction were evaluated preoperatively and at last follow-up.Aims
Methods
The primary aim of this study was to present the mid-term follow-up of a multicentre randomized controlled trial (RCT) which compared the functional outcome following routine removal (RR) to the outcome following on-demand removal (ODR) of the syndesmotic screw (SS). All patients included in the ‘ROutine vs on DEmand removal Of the syndesmotic screw’ (RODEO) trial received the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Hindfoot Score (AOFAS), Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), and EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D). Out of the 152 patients, 109 (71.7%) completed the mid-term follow-up questionnaire and were included in this study (53 treated with RR and 56 with ODR). Median follow-up was 50 months (interquartile range 43.0 to 56.0) since the initial surgical treatment of the acute syndesmotic injury. The primary outcome of this study consisted of the OMAS scores of the two groups.Aims
Methods