The pre-operative differentiation between enchondroma,
low-grade chondrosarcoma and high-grade chondrosarcoma remains a
diagnostic challenge. We reviewed the accuracy and safety of the
radiological grading of cartilaginous tumours through the assessment
of, first, pre-operative radiological and post-operative histological agreement,
and second the rate of recurrence in lesions confirmed as high-grade
on histology. We performed a retrospective review of major long
bone cartilaginous tumours managed by curettage as low grade between
2001 and 2012. A total of 53 patients with a mean age of 47.6 years
(8 to 71) were included. There were 23 men and 30 women. The tumours
involved the femur (n = 20), humerus (n = 18), tibia (n = 9), fibula
(n = 3), radius (n = 2) and ulna (n = 1). Pre-operative diagnoses
resulted from multidisciplinary consensus following radiological
review alone for 35 tumours, or with the addition of pre-operative
image guided needle biopsy for 18. The histologically confirmed diagnosis
was enchondroma for two (3.7%), low-grade chondrosarcoma for 49
(92.6%) and high-grade chondrosarcoma for two (3.7%). Three patients
with a low-grade tumour developed a local recurrence at a mean of 15
months (12 to 17) post-operatively. A single high-grade recurrence
(grade II) was treated with tibial diaphyseal replacement. The overall
recurrence rate was 7.5% at a mean follow-up of 4.7 years (1.2 to
12.3). Cartilaginous tumours identified as low-grade on pre-operative
imaging with or without additional image-guided needle biopsy can
safely be managed as low-grade without pre-operative histological
diagnosis. A few tumours may demonstrate high-grade features histologically,
but the rates of recurrence are not affected. Cite this article:
We undertook a cemental unipolar proximal femoral endoprosthetic replacement in 131 patients with a mean age of 50 years (2 to 84). Primary malignant tumours were present in 54 patients and 67 had metastatic disease. In addition, eight patients had either lymphoma or myeloma and two had non-oncological disorders. The mean follow-up was 27 months (0 to 180). An acetabular revision was required later in 14 patients, 12 of whom had been under the age of 21 years at the time of insertion of their original prosthesis. The risk of acetabular revision in patients over 21 years of age was 8% at five years compared with 36% in those aged under 21 years. All the unipolar hips in this younger age group required revision within 11 years of the initial operation. We conclude that unipolar replacement should not be used in younger patients and should be avoided in patients with a life expectancy of more than five years.
