Charcot neuroarthropathy is a rare but serious complication of diabetes, causing progressive destruction of the bones and joints of the foot leading to deformity, altered biomechanics and an increased risk of ulceration. Management is complicated by a lack of consensus on diagnostic criteria and an incomplete understanding of the pathogenesis. In this review, we consider recent insights into the development of Charcot neuroarthropathy. It is likely to be dependent on several interrelated factors which may include a genetic pre-disposition in combination with diabetic neuropathy. This leads to decreased neuropeptides (nitric oxide and calcitonin gene-related peptide), which may affect the normal coupling of bone formation and resorption, and increased levels of Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand, potentiating osteoclastogenesis. Repetitive unrecognized trauma due to neuropathy increases levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, tumour necrosis factor α) which could also contribute to increased bone resorption, in combination with a pre-inflammatory state, with increased autoimmune reactivity and a profile of monocytes primed to transform into osteoclasts - cluster of differentiation 14 (CD14). Increased blood glucose and loss of circulating Receptor for Advanced Glycation End-Products (AGLEPs), leading to increased non-enzymatic glycation of collagen and accumulation of AGLEPs in the tissues of the foot, may also contribute to the pathological process. An understanding of the relative contributions of each of these mechanisms and a final common pathway for the development of Charcot neuroarthropathy are still lacking.
Osteochondral lesions (OCLs) occur in up to 70%
of sprains and fractures involving the ankle. Atraumatic aetiologies have
also been described. Techniques such as microfracture, and replacement
strategies such as autologous osteochondral transplantation, or
autologous chondrocyte implantation are the major forms of surgical
treatment. Current literature suggests that microfracture is indicated
for lesions up to 15 mm in diameter, with replacement strategies
indicated for larger or cystic lesions. Short- and medium-term results
have been reported, where concerns over potential deterioration
of fibrocartilage leads to a need for long-term evaluation. Biological augmentation may also be used in the treatment of
OCLs, as they potentially enhance the biological environment for
a natural healing response. Further research is required to establish
the critical size of defect, beyond which replacement strategies
should be used, as well as the most appropriate use of biological augmentation.
This paper reviews the current evidence for surgical management
and use of biological adjuncts for treatment of osteochondral lesions
of the talus. Cite this article:
