The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the
clinical relevance of increased facet joint distraction as a result
of anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) for trauma. A total of 155 patients (130 men, 25 women. Mean age 42.7 years;
16 to 87) who had undergone ACDF between 1 January 2001 and 1 January
2016 were included in the study. Outcome measures included the Neck
Disability Index (NDI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain.
Lateral cervical spine radiographs taken in the immediate postoperative
period were reviewed to compare the interfacet distance of the operated
segment with those of the facet joints above and below.Aims
Patients and Methods
Traumatic central cord syndrome (CCS) typically follows a hyperextension injury and results in motor impairment affecting the upper limbs more than the lower, with occasional sensory impairment and urinary retention. Current evidence on mortality and long-term outcomes is limited. The primary aim of this study was to assess the five-year mortality of CCS, and to determine any difference in mortality between management groups or age. Patients aged ≥ 18 years with a traumatic CCS between January 2012 and December 2017 in Wales were identified. Patient demographics and data about injury, management, and outcome were collected. Statistical analysis was performed to assess mortality and between-group differences.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to determine whether early surgical treatment results in better neurological recovery 12 months after injury than late surgical treatment in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI). Patients with tSCI requiring surgical spinal decompression presenting to 17 centres in Europe were recruited. Depending on the timing of decompression, patients were divided into early (≤ 12 hours after injury) and late (> 12 hours and < 14 days after injury) groups. The American Spinal Injury Association neurological (ASIA) examination was performed at baseline (after injury but before decompression) and at 12 months. The primary endpoint was the change in Lower Extremity Motor Score (LEMS) from baseline to 12 months.Aims
Methods
Gram-negative infections are associated with comorbid patients, but outcomes are less well understood. This study reviewed diagnosis, management, and treatment for a cohort treated in a tertiary spinal centre. A retrospective review was performed of all gram-negative spinal infections (n = 32; median age 71 years; interquartile range 60 to 78), excluding surgical site infections, at a single centre between 2015 to 2020 with two- to six-year follow-up. Information regarding organism identification, antibiotic regime, and treatment outcomes (including clinical, radiological, and biochemical) were collected from clinical notes.Aims
Methods
Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a progressive
multisystem chronic inflammatory disorder. The hallmark of this pathological
process is a progressive fusion of the zygapophyseal joints and
disc spaces of the axial skeleton, leading to a rigid kyphotic deformity
and positive sagittal balance. The ankylosed spine is unable to
accommodate normal mechanical forces, rendering it brittle and susceptible
to
This study examined spinal fractures in patients
admitted to a Major Trauma Centre via two independent pathways,
a major trauma (MT) pathway and a standard unscheduled non-major
trauma (NMT) pathway. A total of 134 patients were admitted with
a spinal fracture over a period of two years; 50% of patients were
MT and the remainder NMT. MT patients were predominantly male, had
a mean age of 48.8 years (13 to 95), commonly underwent surgery
(62.7%), characteristically had fractures in the cervico-thoracic
and thoracic regions and 50% had fractures of more than one vertebrae,
which were radiologically unstable in 70%. By contrast, NMT patients
showed an equal gender distribution, were older (mean 58.1 years;
12 to 94), required fewer operations (56.7%), characteristically
had fractures in the lumbar region and had fewer multiple and unstable
fractures. This level of complexity was reflected in the length
of stay in hospital; MT patients receiving surgery were in hospital
for a mean of three to four days longer than NMT patients. These
results show that MT patients differ from their NMT counterparts
and have an increasing complexity of spinal injury. Cite this article:
We retrospectively examined the prevalence and
natural history of asymptomatic lumbar canal stenosis in patients treated
surgically for cervical compressive myelopathy in order to assess
the influence of latent lumbar canal stenosis on the recovery after
surgery. Of 214 patients who had undergone cervical laminoplasty
for cervical myelopathy, we identified 69 (32%) with myelographically
documented lumbar canal stenosis. Of these, 28 (13%) patients with
symptomatic lumbar canal stenosis underwent simultaneous cervical
and lumbar decompression. Of the remaining 41 (19%) patients with
asymptomatic lumbar canal stenosis who underwent only cervical surgery,
39 were followed up for ≥ 1 year (mean 4.9 years (1 to 12)) and
were included in the analysis (study group). Patients without myelographic
evidence of lumbar canal stenosis, who had been followed up for ≥ 1
year after the cervical surgery, served as controls (135 patients;
mean follow-up period 6.5 years (1 to 17)). Among the 39 patients
with asymptomatic lumbar canal stenosis, seven had lumbar-related
leg symptoms after the cervical surgery. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that 89.6% (95% confidence interval
(CI) 75.3 to 96.0) and 76.7% (95% CI 53.7 to 90.3) of the patients
with asymptomatic lumbar canal stenosis were free from leg symptoms
for three and five years, respectively. There were no significant
differences between the study and control groups in the recovery
rate measured by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score or improvement
in the Nurick score at one year after surgery or at the final follow-up. These results suggest that latent lumbar canal stenosis does
not influence recovery following surgery for cervical myelopathy;
moreover, prophylactic lumbar decompression does not appear to be
warranted as a routine procedure for coexistent asymptomatic lumbar
canal stenosis in patients with cervical myelopathy, when planning
cervical surgery.
