The aim of this study was to evaluate the ten-year
clinical and functional outcome of hip resurfacing and to compare it
with that of cementless hip arthroplasty in patients under the age
of 55 years. Between 1999 and 2002, 80 patients were enrolled into the study:
24 were randomised (11 to hip resurfacing, 13 to total hip arthroplasty),
18 refused hip resurfacing and chose cementless total hip arthroplasty
with a 32 mm bearing, and 38 insisted on resurfacing. The mean follow-up
for all patients was 12.1 years (10 to 14). Patients were assessed clinically and radiologically at one year,
five years and ten years. Outcome measures included EuroQol EQ5D,
Oxford, Harris hip, University of California Los Angeles and University
College Hospital functional scores. No differences were seen between the two groups in the Oxford
or Harris hip scores or in the quality of life scores. Despite a
similar aspiration to activity pre-operatively, a higher proportion
of patients with a hip resurfacing were running and involved in
sport and heavy manual labour after ten years. We found significantly higher function scores in patients who
had undergone hip resurfacing than in those with a cementless hip
arthroplasty at ten years. This suggests a functional advantage
for hip resurfacing. There were no other attendant problems. Cite this article:
