The aims of this study were to estimate the cost of surgical
treatment of fractures of the proximal humerus using a micro-costing
methodology, contrast this cost with the national reimbursement
tariff and establish the major determinants of cost. A detailed inpatient treatment pathway was constructed using
semi-structured interviews with 32 members of hospital staff. Its
content validity was established through a Delphi panel evaluation.
Costs were calculated using time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC)
and sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the determinants
of costAims
Methods
We hypothesised that cells obtained via a Reamer–Irrigator–Aspirator
(RIA) system retain substantial osteogenic potential and are at
least equivalent to graft harvested from the iliac crest. Graft
was harvested using the RIA in 25 patients (mean age 37.6 years
(18 to 68)) and from the iliac crest in 21 patients (mean age 44.6
years (24 to 78)), after which ≥ 1 g of bony particulate graft material
was processed from each. Initial cell viability was assessed using Trypan
blue exclusion, and initial fluorescence-activated cell sorting
(FACS) analysis for cell lineage was performed. After culturing
the cells, repeat FACS analysis for cell lineage was performed and
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for osteocalcin, and Alizarin
red staining to determine osteogenic potential. Cells obtained via
RIA or from the iliac crest were viable and matured into mesenchymal
stem cells, as shown by staining for the specific mesenchymal antigens
CD90 and CD105. For samples from both RIA and the iliac crest there
was a statistically significant increase in bone production (both
p <
0.001), as demonstrated by osteocalcin production after induction. Medullary autograft cells harvested using RIA are viable and
osteogenic. Cell viability and osteogenic potential were similar
between bone grafts obtained from both the RIA system and the iliac
crest. Cite this article:
We report the incidence and location of deep-vein thrombosis in 312 patients who had sustained high-energy, skeletal trauma. They were investigated using magnetic resonance venography and Duplex ultrasound. Despite thromboprophylaxis, 36 (11.5%) developed venous thromboembolic disease with an incidence of 10% in those with non-pelvic trauma and 12.2% in the group with pelvic trauma. Of patients who developed deep-vein thrombosis, 13 of 27 in the pelvic group (48%) and only one of nine in the non-pelvic group (11%) had a definite pelvic deep-vein thrombosis. When compared with magnetic resonance venography, ultrasound had a false-negative rate of 77% in diagnosing pelvic deep-vein thrombosis. Its value in the pelvis was limited, although it was more accurate than magnetic resonance venography in diagnosing clots in the lower limbs. Additional screening may be needed to detect pelvic deep-vein thrombosis in patients with pelvic or acetabular fractures.
