We have evaluated the survivorship, outcomes, and failures of an interlocking, reconstruction-mode stem-sideplate implant used to preserve the native hip joint and achieve proximal fixation when there is little residual femur during large endoprosthetic reconstruction of the distal femur. A total of 14 patients underwent primary or revision reconstruction of a large femoral defect with a short remaining proximal femur using an interlocking, reconstruction-mode stem-sideplate for fixation after oncological distal femoral and diaphyseal resections. The implant was attached to a standard endoprosthetic reconstruction system. The implant was attached to a standard endoprosthetic reconstruction system. None of the femoral revisions were amenable to standard cemented or uncemented stem fixation. Patient and disease characteristics, surgical history, final ambulatory statusAims
Methods
The aim of this study was to evaluate the prosthesis characteristics and associated conditions that may modify the survival of total femoral endoprosthetic replacements (TFEPR). In all, 81 patients treated with TFEPR from 1976 to 2017 were retrospectively evaluated and failures were categorized according to the Henderson classification. There were 38 female patients (47%) and 43 male patients (53%) with a mean age at diagnosis of 43 years (12 to 86). The mean follow-up time was 10.3 years (0 to 31.7). A survival analysis was performed followed by univariate and multivariate Cox regression to identify independent implant survival factors.Aims
Patients and Methods
Aims
Patients and Methods
Excision of the proximal femur for tumour with
prosthetic reconstruction using a bipolar femoral head places a considerable
load on the unreplaced acetabulum. We retrospectively reviewed the changes which occur around the
affected hip joint by evaluating the post-operative radiographs
of 65 consecutive patients who underwent proximal prosthetic arthroplasty
of the femur, and in whom an acetabular component had not been used.
There were 37 men and 28 women with a mean age of 57.3 years (17
to 93). Radiological assessment included the extent of degenerative
change in the acetabulum, heterotopic ossification, and protrusio
acetabuli. The mean follow-up was 9.1 years (2 to 11.8). Degenerative changes
in the acetabulum were seen in three patients (4.6%), Brooker grade
1 or 2 heterotopic ossification in 17 (26%) and protrusion of the
prosthetic head in nine (13.8%). A total of eight patients (12.3%) needed a revision. Five were
revised to the same type of prosthesis and three (4.6%) were converted
to a total hip arthroplasty. We conclude that radiological evidence of degenerative change,
heterotopic ossification and protrusion occur in a few patients
who undergo prosthetic arthroplasty of the proximal femur for tumour.
The limited extent of these changes and the lack of associated symptoms
do not justify the routine arthroplasty of the acetabulum in these patients. Cite this article:
