The PROximal Fracture of the Humerus Evaluation by Randomisation
(PROFHER) randomised clinical trial compared the operative and non-operative
treatment of adults with a displaced fracture of the proximal humerus
involving the surgical neck. The aim of this study was to determine
the long-term treatment effects beyond the two-year follow-up. Of the original 250 trial participants, 176 consented to extended
follow-up and were sent postal questionnaires at three, four and
five years after recruitment to the trial. The Oxford Shoulder Score
(OSS; the primary outcome), EuroQol 5D-3L (EQ-5D-3L), and any recent
shoulder operations and fracture data were collected. Statistical
and economic analyses, consistent with those of the main trial were
applied.Aims
Patients and Methods
Fractures of the proximal femur are one of the
greatest challenges facing the medical community, constituting a
heavy socioeconomic burden worldwide. Controversy exists regarding
the optimal treatment for independent patients with displaced intracapsular fractures
of the proximal femur. The recognised alternatives are hemiarthroplasty
and total hip replacement. At present there is no established standard
of care, with both types of arthroplasty being used in many centres.
The principal advantages of total hip replacement are a functional
benefit over hemiarthroplasty and a reduced risk of revision surgery.
The principal criticism is the increased risk of dislocation. We
believe that an alternative acetabular component may reduce the
risk of dislocation but still provide the functional benefit of
total hip replacement in these patients. We therefore propose to
investigate the dislocation risk of a dual-mobility acetabular component
compared with standard polyethylene component in total hip replacement
for independent patients with displaced intracapsular fractures
of the proximal femur within the framework of the larger WHiTE (Warwick
Hip Trauma Evaluation) Comprehensive Cohort Study. Cite this article:
Fractures of the proximal femur are one of the
greatest challenges facing the medical community, constituting a
heavy socioeconomic burden worldwide. Controversy exists regarding
the optimal treatment for patients with unstable trochanteric proximal
femoral fractures. The recognised treatment alternatives are extramedullary
fixation usually with a sliding hip screw and intramedullary fixation
with a cephalomedullary nail. Current evidence suggests that best
results and lowest complication rates occur using a sliding hip screw.
Complications in these difficult fractures are relatively common
regardless of type of treatment. We believe that a novel device,
the X-Bolt dynamic plating system, may offer superior fixation over
a sliding hip screw with lower reoperation risk and better function.
We therefore propose to investigate the clinical effectiveness of
the X-bolt dynamic plating system compared with standard sliding
hip screw fixation within the framework of a the larger WHiTE (Warwick
Hip Trauma Evaluation) Comprehensive Cohort Study. Cite this article:
To synthesise the literature and perform a meta-analysis detailing
the longitudinal recovery in the first two years following a distal
radius fracture (DRF) managed with volar plate fixation. Three databases were searched to identify relevant articles.
Following eligibility screening and quality assessment, data were
extracted and outcomes were assimilated at the post-operative time
points of interest. A state-of-the-art longitudinal mixed-effects
meta-analysis model was employed to analyse the data.Aims
Materials and Methods
We reviewed 59 bone graft substitutes marketed
by 17 companies currently available for implantation in the United Kingdom,
with the aim of assessing the peer-reviewed literature to facilitate
informed decision-making regarding their use in clinical practice.
After critical analysis of the literature, only 22 products (37%)
had any clinical data. Norian SRS (Synthes), Vitoss (Orthovita),
Cortoss (Orthovita) and Alpha-BSM (Etex) had Level I evidence. We question
the need for so many different products, especially with limited
published clinical evidence for their efficacy, and conclude that
there is a considerable need for further prospective randomised
trials to facilitate informed decision-making with regard to the
use of current and future bone graft substitutes in clinical practice. Cite this article:
