To develop a multidisciplinary health research agenda (HRA) utilizing expertise from various disciplines to identify and prioritize evidence uncertainties in orthopaedics, thereby reducing research waste. We employed a novel, structured framework to develop a HRA. We started by systematically collecting all evidence uncertainties from stakeholders with an interest in orthopaedic care, categorizing them into 13 sub-themes defined by the Dutch Orthopaedic Association (NOV). Subsequently, a modified two-phased Delphi study (two rounds per phase), adhering to the Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) guideline, was conducted. In Phase 1, board members assessed the collected evidence uncertainties on a three-point Likert scale to confirm knowledge gaps. In Phase 2, diverse stakeholders, including orthopaedic surgeons, rated the confirmed knowledge gaps on a seven-point Likert scale. Panel members rated one self-selected sub-theme and two randomly assigned sub-themes. The results from Phase 2 were ranked based on the overall average score for each uncertainty. Finally, a focus group discussion with patient associations’ representatives identified their top-ranked uncertainty from a predefined consensus process, leading to the final HRA. An advisory board, the Federation of Medical Specialists, and the NOV research coordinator oversaw the process.Aims
Methods
There is a high rate of mortality in elderly
patients who sustain a fracture of the hip. We aimed to determine
the rate of preventable mortality and errors during the management
of these patients. A 12 month prospective study was performed on
patients aged >
65 years who had sustained a fracture of the hip.
This was conducted at a Level 1 Trauma Centre with no orthogeriatric
service. A multidisciplinary review of the medical records by four
specialists was performed to analyse errors of management and elements
of preventable mortality. During 2011, there were 437 patients aged
>
65 years admitted with a fracture of the hip (85 years (66 to
99)) and 20 died while in hospital (86.3 years (67 to 96)). A total
of 152 errors were identified in the 80 individual reviews of the
20 deaths. A total of 99 errors (65%) were thought to have at least
a moderate effect on death; 45 reviews considering death (57%) were thought
to have potentially been preventable. Agreement between the panel
of reviewers on the preventability of death was fair. A larger-scale
assessment of preventable mortality in elderly patients who sustain
a fracture of the hip is required. Multidisciplinary review panels
could be considered as part of the quality assurance
