The aim of this study was to compare the rate of perioperative
complications following aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty
(THA) in patients aged ≥ 80 years with that in those aged <
80
years, and to identify risk factors for the incidence of serious
adverse events in those aged ≥ 80 years using a large validated
national database. Patients who underwent aseptic revision THA were identified in
the 2005 to 2015 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP)
database and stratified into two age groups: those aged <
80
years and those aged ≥ 80 years. Preoperative and procedural characteristics
were compared. Multivariate regression analysis was used to compare
the risk of postoperative complications and readmission. Risk factors
for the development of a serious adverse event in those aged ≥ 80
years were characterized.Aims
Patients and Methods
Optimal exposure through the direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) conducted on a regular operating theatre table is achieved with a standardized capsular releasing sequence in which the anterior capsule can be preserved or resected. We hypothesized that clinical outcomes and implant positioning would not be different in case a capsular sparing (CS) technique would be compared to capsular resection (CR). In this prospective trial, 219 hips in 190 patients were randomized to either the CS (n = 104) or CR (n = 115) cohort. In the CS cohort, a medial based anterior flap was created and sutured back in place at the end of the procedure. The anterior capsule was resected in the CR cohort. Primary outcome was defined as the difference in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after one year. PROMs (Harris Hip Score (HHS), Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), and Short Form 36 Item Health Survey (SF-36)) were collected preoperatively and one year postoperatively. Radiological parameters were analyzed to assess implant positioning and implant ingrowth. Adverse events were monitored.Aims
Methods
