We used immediate post-operative in vivo three-dimensional computed tomography to compare graft bending angles and femoral tunnel lengths in 155 patients who had undergone single-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using the transtibial (n = 37), anteromedial portal (n = 72) and outside-in (n = 46) techniques. The bending angles in the sagittal and axial planes were significantly greater but the coronal-bending angle was significantly less in the transtibial group than in the anteromedial portal and outside-in groups (p < 0.001 each). The mean length of the femoral tunnel in all three planes was significantly greater in the transtibial group than the anteromedial portal and outside-in groups (p < 0.001 each), but all mean tunnel lengths in the three groups exceeded 30 mm. The only significant difference was the coronal graft- bending angle in the anteromedial portal and outside-in groups (23.5° vs 29.8°, p = 0.012). Compared with the transtibial technique, the anteromedial portal and outside-in techniques may reduce the graft-bending stress at the opening of the femoral tunnel. Despite the femoral tunnel length being shorter in the anteromedial portal and outside-in techniques than in the transtibial technique, a femoral tunnel length of more than 30 mm in the anteromedial portal and outside-in techniques may be sufficient for the graft to heal. . Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:743–51

Aims

To investigate the risk factors for progression of articular cartilage damage after anatomical anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Total knee replacement (TKR) smart tibial trials have load-bearing sensors which will show quantitative compartment pressure values and femoral-tibial tracking patterns. Without smart trials, surgeons rely on feel and visual estimation of imbalance to determine if the knee is optimally balanced. Corrective soft-tissue releases are performed with minimal feedback as to what and how much should be released. The smart tibial trials demonstrate graphically where and how much imbalance is present, so that incremental releases can be performed. The smart tibial trials now also incorporate accelerometers which demonstrate the axial alignment. This now allows the surgeon the option to perform a slight recut of the tibia or femur to provide soft-tissue balance without performing soft-tissue releases. Using a smart tibial trial to assist with soft-tissue releases or bone re-cuts, improved patient outcomes have been demonstrated at one year in a multicentre study of 135 patients (135 knees).

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B(11 Suppl A):78–83.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term functional and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic removal of unstable osteochondral lesions with subchondral drilling in the lateral femoral condyle. We reviewed the outcome of 23 patients (28 knees) with stage III or IV osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the lateral femoral condyle at a mean follow-up of 14 years (10 to 19). The functional clinical outcomes were assessed using the Lysholm score, which improved from a mean of 38.1 (sd 3.5) pre-operatively to a mean of 87.3 (sd 5.4) at the most recent review (p = 0.034), and the Tegner activity score, which improved from a pre-operative median of 2 (0 to 3) to a median of 5 (3 to 7) at final follow-up (p = 0.021). The radiological degenerative changes were evaluated according to Tapper and Hoover’s classification and when compared with the pre-operative findings, one knee had grade 1, 22 knees had grade 2 and five knees had grade 3 degenerative changes. The overall outcomes were assessed using Hughston’s rating scale, where 19 knees were rated as good, four as fair and five as poor.

We found radiological evidence of degenerative changes in the third or fourth decade of life at a mean of 14 years after arthroscopic excision of the loose body and subchondral drilling for an unstable osteochondral lesion of the lateral femoral condyle. Clinical and functional results were more satisfactory.

The lateral compartment is predominantly affected in approximately 10% of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. The anatomy, kinematics and loading during movement differ considerably between medial and lateral compartments of the knee. This in the main explains the relative protection of the lateral compartment compared with the medial compartment in the development of osteoarthritis. The aetiology of lateral compartment osteoarthritis can be idiopathic, usually affecting the femur, or secondary to trauma commonly affecting the tibia. Surgical management of lateral compartment osteoarthritis can include osteotomy, unicompartmental knee replacement and total knee replacement. This review discusses the biomechanics, pathogenesis and development of lateral compartment osteoarthritis and its management.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:436–44.