Aims. The aim of this study was to compare the characteristics and outcomes of L-shaped and reverse L-shaped rotator cuff tears. Methods. A total of 82 shoulders (81 patients) after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were retrospectively enrolled. The mean age of the patients was 62 years (SD 6), 33 shoulders (40.2%) were in male patients, and 57 shoulders (69.5%) were the right shoulder. Of these, 36 shoulders had an L-shaped tear (group L) and 46 had a reverse L-shaped tear (group RL). Both groups were compared regarding characteristics, pre- and postoperative pain, and functional outcomes. Muscle status was assessed by preoperative MRI, and re-tear rates by postoperative ultrasonography or MRI. Results. Patients in group RL were significantly older than in group L (p = 0.008), and group RL was significantly associated with female sex (odds ratio 2.5 (95% confidence interval 1.03 to 6.32); p = 0.041). Mean postoperative pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score was significantly greater (group L = 0.8 (SD 1.5), group RL = 1.7 (SD 2.2); p = 0.033) and mean postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score was significantly lower in group RL than group L (group L = 91.4 (SD 13.1), group RL = 83.8 (SD 17.9); p = 0.028). However, postoperative mean VAS for pain and ASES score were not lower than the patient-acceptable symptom state scores. Mean retracted tear length was significantly larger in group L (group L = 24.6 mm (SD 6.5), group RL = 20.0 mm (SD 6.8); p = 0.003). Overall re-tear rate for 82 tears was 11.0% (nine shoulders), and re-tear rates in group L and RL were similar at 11.1% (four shoulders) and 10.9% (five shoulders), respectively (p = 1.000). No significant intergroup difference was found for fatty degeneration (FD) or muscle atrophy. Within group L, postoperative FD grades of supraspinatus and subscapularis worsened significantly (p = 0.034 and p = 0.008, respectively). Mean postoperative pain VAS (male = 1.2 (SD 1.8), female = 1.3 (SD 2.0)) and ASES scores (male = 88.7 (SD 15.5), female = 86.0 (SD 16.8)) were similar in male and female patients (p = 0.700 and p = 0.475, respectively). Regression analysis showed age was not a prognostic factor of postoperative pain VAS or ASES scores (p = 0.188 and p = 0.150, respectively). Conclusion.
We retrospectively reviewed 89 consecutive patients
(45 men and 44 women) with a mean age at the time of injury of 58
years (18 to 97) who had undergone external fixation after sustaining
a unilateral fracture of the distal humerus. Our objectives were
to determine the incidence of heterotopic ossification (HO); identify
risk factors associated with the development of HO; and characterise
the location, severity and resultant functional impairment attributable
to the presence of HO. HO was identified in 37 elbows (42%), mostly around the humerus
and along the course of the medial collateral ligament. HO was hazy
immature in five elbows (13.5%), mature discrete in 20 (54%), extensive
mature in 10 (27%), and complete bone bridges were present in two
elbows (5.5%). Mild functional impairment occurred in eight patients,
moderate in 27 and severe in two. HO was associated with less extension
(p = 0.032) and less overall flexion-to-extension movement (p =
0.022); the flexion-to-extension arc was <
100º in 21 elbows
(57%) with HO compared with 18 elbows (35%) without HO (p = 0.03).
HO was removed surgically in seven elbows. The development of HO was significantly associated with sustaining
a head injury (p = 0.015), delayed internal fixation (p = 0.027),
the method of fracture fixation (p = 0.039) and the use of bone
graft or substitute (p = 0.02).HO continues to be a substantial
complication after internal fixation for distal humerus fractures. Cite this article:
