Arthroplasty has become increasingly popular to treat end-stage ankle arthritis. Iatrogenic posterior neurovascular and tendinous injury have been described from saw cuts. However, it is hypothesized that posterior ankle structures could be damaged by inserting tibial guide pins too deeply and be a potential cause of residual hindfoot pain. The preparation steps for ankle arthroplasty were performed using the Infinity total ankle system in five right-sided cadaveric ankles. All tibial guide pins were intentionally inserted past the posterior tibial cortex for assessment. All posterior ankles were subsequently dissected, with the primary endpoint being the presence of direct contact between the structure and pin.Aims
Methods
Neuropathic changes in the foot are common with
a prevalence of approximately 1%. The diagnosis of neuropathic arthropathy
is often delayed in diabetic patients with harmful consequences
including amputation. The appropriate diagnosis and treatment can
avoid an extensive programme of treatment with significant morbidity
for the patient, high costs and delayed surgery. The pathogenesis
of a Charcot foot involves repetitive micro-trauma in a foot with impaired
sensation and neurovascular changes caused by pathological innervation
of the blood vessels. In most cases, changes are due to a combination
of both pathophysiological factors. The Charcot foot is triggered
by a combination of mechanical, vascular and biological factors
which can lead to late diagnosis and incorrect treatment and eventually
to destruction of the foot. This review aims to raise awareness of the diagnosis of the Charcot
foot (diabetic neuropathic osteoarthropathy and the differential
diagnosis, erysipelas, peripheral arterial occlusive disease) and
describe the ways in which the diagnosis may be made. The clinical
diagnostic pathways based on different classifications are presented. Cite this article:
