To identify a core outcome set of postoperative radiographic measurements to assess technical skill in ankle fracture open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), and to validate these against Van der Vleuten’s criteria for effective assessment. An e-Delphi exercise was undertaken at a major trauma centre (n = 39) to identify relevant parameters. Feasibility was tested by two authors. Reliability and validity was tested using postoperative radiographs of ankle fracture operations performed by trainees enrolled in an educational trial (IRCTN 20431944). To determine construct validity, trainees were divided into novice (performed < ten cases at baseline) and intermediate groups (performed ≥ ten cases at baseline). To assess concurrent validity, the procedure-based assessment (PBA) was considered the gold standard. The inter-rater and intrarater reliability was tested using a randomly selected subset of 25 cases.Aims
Methods
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the
clinical results of a newly designed prosthesis to replace the body
of the talus in patients with aseptic necrosis. Between 1999 and
2006, 22 tali in 22 patients were replaced with a ceramic prosthesis.
A total of eight patients were treated with the first-generation
prosthesis, incorporating a peg to fix into the retained neck and
head of the talus, and the remaining 14 were treated with the second-generation prosthesis,
which does not have the peg. The clinical results were assessed
by the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle/hindfoot
scale. The mean follow-up was 98 months (18 to 174). The clinical results
of the first-generation prostheses were excellent in three patients,
good in one, fair in three and poor in one. There were, however,
radiological signs of loosening, prompting a change in design. The
clinical results of the second-generation prostheses were excellent
in three patients, good in five, fair in four and poor in two, with
more favourable radiological appearances. Revision was required
using a total talar implant in four patients, two in each group. Although the second-generation prosthesis produced better results,
we cannot recommend the use of a talar body prosthesis. We now recommend
the use of a total talar implant in these patients.
