Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 9 of 9
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 5 | Pages 422 - 424
1 May 2024
Theologis T Perry DC

In 2017, the British Society for Children’s Orthopaedic Surgery engaged the profession and all relevant stakeholders in two formal research prioritization processes. In this editorial, we describe the impact of this prioritization on funding, and how research in children’s orthopaedics, which was until very recently a largely unfunded and under-investigated area, is now flourishing. Establishing research priorities was a crucial step in this process.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(5):422–424.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1036 - 1038
1 Oct 2024
Tennent TD Watts AC Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 105-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1235 - 1238
1 Dec 2023
Kader DF Jones S Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 6 | Pages 516 - 521
1 Jun 2024
Al-Hourani K Haddad FS


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 11, Issue 2 | Pages 3 - 4
1 Apr 2022
Ollivere B


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 3 | Pages 233 - 235
1 Mar 2019
Ollivere BJ Marson BA Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 6 | Pages 625 - 626
1 Jun 2019
Price AJ Haddad FS Beard DJ


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 2 | Pages 147 - 151
1 Feb 2016
Haddad FS McLawhorn AS

Health economic evaluations potentially provide valuable information to clinicians, health care administrators, and policy makers regarding the financial implications of decisions about the care of patients. The highest quality research should be used to inform decisions that have direct impact on the access to care and the outcome of treatment. However, economic analyses are often complex and use research methods which are relatively unfamiliar to clinicians. Furthermore, health economic data have substantial national, regional, and institutional variability, which can limit the external validity of the results of a study. Therefore, minimum guidelines that aim to standardise the quality and transparency of reporting health economic research have been developed, and instruments are available to assist in the assessment of its quality and the interpretation of results.

The purpose of this editorial is to discuss the principal types of health economic studies, to review the most common instruments for judging the quality of these studies and to describe current reporting guidelines. Recommendations for the submission of these types of studies to The Bone & Joint Journal are provided.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:147–51.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1575 - 1577
1 Dec 2014
Perry DC Parsons N Costa ML

The extent and depth of routine health care data are growing at an ever-increasing rate, forming huge repositories of information. These repositories can answer a vast array of questions. However, an understanding of the purpose of the dataset used and the quality of the data collected are paramount to determine the reliability of the result obtained.

This Editorial describes the importance of adherence to sound methodological principles in the reporting and publication of research using ‘big’ data, with a suggested reporting framework for future Bone & Joint Journal submissions.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1575–7.