We investigated the spinopelvic morphology and
global sagittal balance of patients with a degenerative retrolisthesis
or anterolisthesis. A total of 269 consecutive patients with a degenerative
spondylolisthesis were included in this study. There were 95 men
and 174 women with a mean age of 64.3 years ( A backward slip was found in the upper lumbar levels (mostly
L2 or L3) with an almost equal gender distribution in both the R
and R+A groups. The pelvic incidence and sacral slope of the R group
were significantly lower than those of the A (both p <
0.001)
and R+A groups (both p <
0.001). The lumbar lordosis of the R+A
group was significantly greater than that of the R (p = 0.025) and
A groups (p = 0.014). The C7 plumb line of the R group was located
more posteriorly than that of the A group (p = 0.023), but was no
different from than that of the R+A group (p = 0.422). The location
of C7 plumb line did not differ between the three groups (p = 0.068).
The spinosacral angle of the R group was significantly smaller than
that of the A group (p <
0.001) and R+A group (p <
0.001). Our findings imply that there are two types of degenerative retrolisthesis:
one occurs primarily as a result of degeneration in patients with
low pelvic incidence, and the other occurs secondarily as a compensatory
mechanism in patients with an anterolisthesis and high pelvic incidence. Cite this article:
This prospective multicentre study was undertaken
to determine segmental movement, disc height and sagittal alignment
after total disc replacement (TDR) in the lumbosacral spine and
to assess the correlation of biomechanical properties to clinical
outcomes. A total of 173 patients with degenerative disc disease and low
back pain for more than one year were randomised to receive either
TDR or multidisciplinary rehabilitation (MDR). Segmental movement
in the sagittal plane and disc height were measured using distortion
compensated roentgen analysis (DCRA) comparing radiographs in active flexion
and extension. Correlation analysis between the range of movement
or disc height and patient-reported outcomes was performed in both
groups. After two years, no significant change in movement in the
sagittal plane was found in segments with TDR or between the two
treatment groups. It remained the same or increased slightly in
untreated segments in the TDR group and in this group there was
a significant increase in disc height in the operated segments.
There was no correlation between segmental movement or disc height
and patient-reported outcomes in either group. In this study, insertion of an intervertebral disc prosthesis
TDR did not increase movement in the sagittal plane and segmental
movement did not correlate with patient-reported outcomes. This
suggests that in the lumbar spine the movement preserving properties
of TDR are not major determinants of clinical outcomes. Cite this article:
