Aims. The aim of this study was to compare the Push Ortho Thumb Brace
CMC and a custom-made orthosis in the treatment of patients with
primary osteoarthritis of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb.
Our outcome measures were pain scores, tests of hand function, patient
satisfaction and patient preference. Patients and Methods. A multicentre crossover randomised controlled trial was conducted
which included 63 patients (44 women) with primary osteoarthritis
of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb. Of these, 59 patients
with a mean age of 60.1 years (standard deviation 8.2), completed
the study. Patients used both orthoses for two weeks with a two-week washout
period in-between. Pain was measured on a 10-cm visual analogue
scale. Hand function was assessed using the Jebsen Taylor Hand Function
test, Nine Hole Peg Test, key grip, pinch grip and Functional Index
for Hand Osteoarthritis. Patient preference was assessed using the
Dutch version of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with
Assistive Technology score. Results. Both orthoses resulted in a minor reduction in pain scores without
significant difference between the two orthoses. The Push Ortho
Thumb
There is no level I evidence dealing with the optimal period of immobilization for patients with a displaced distal radial fracture following closed reduction. A shorter period might lead to a better functional outcome due to less stiffness and pain. The aim of this study was to investigate whether this period could be safely reduced from six to four weeks. This multicentre randomized controlled trial (RCT) included adult patients with a displaced distal radial fracture, who were randomized to be treated with immobilization in a cast for four or six weeks following closed reduction. The primary outcome measure was the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score after follow-up at one year. Secondary outcomes were the abbreviated version of the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score after one year, the functional outcome at six weeks, 12 weeks, and six months, range of motion (ROM), the level of pain after removal of the cast, and complications.Aims
Methods
The study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic debridement and partial excision in patients with traumatic central tears of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC), and to identify prognostic factors associated with unfavourable clinical outcomes. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients arthroscopically diagnosed with Palmer 1 A lesions who underwent arthroscopic debridement and partial excision from March 2009 to February 2021, with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Patients were assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, Mayo Wrist Score (MWS), and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain. The poor outcome group was defined as patients whose preoperative and last follow-up clinical score difference was less than the minimal clinically important difference of the DASH score (10.83). Baseline characteristics, arthroscopic findings, and radiological factors (ulnar variance, MRI, or arthrography) were evaluated to predict poor clinical outcomes.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to assess and compare active rotation of the forearm in normal subjects after the application of a short-arm cast (SAC) in the semisupination position and a long-arm cast (LAC) in the neutral position. A clinical study was also conducted to compare the functional outcomes of using a SAC in the semisupination position with those of using a LAC in the neutral position in patients who underwent arthroscopic triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) foveal repair. A total of 40 healthy right-handed volunteers were recruited. Active pronation and supination of the forearm were measured in each subject using a goniometer. In the retrospective clinical study, 40 patients who underwent arthroscopic foveal repair were included. The wrist was immobilized postoperatively using a SAC in the semisupination position (approximately 45°) in 16 patients and a LAC in 24. Clinical outcomes were assessed using grip strength and patient-reported outcomes. The degree of disability caused by cast immobilization was also evaluated when the cast was removed.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to investigate whether clinical and radiological outcomes after intramedullary nailing of displaced fractures of the fifth metacarpal neck using a single thick Kirschner wire (K-wire) are noninferior to those of technically more demanding fixation with two thinner dual wires. This was a multicentre, parallel group, randomized controlled noninferiority trial conducted at 12 tertiary trauma centres in Germany. A total of 290 patients with acute displaced fractures of the fifth metacarpal neck were randomized to either intramedullary single-wire (n = 146) or dual-wire fixation (n = 144). The primary outcome was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire six months after surgery, with a third of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) used as the noninferiority threshold. Secondary outcomes were pain, health-related quality of life (EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D)), radiological measures, functional deficits, and complications.Aims
Patients and Methods
We present an economic evaluation using data
from the Distal Radius Acute Fracture Fixation Trial (DRAFFT) to compare
the relative cost effectiveness of percutaneous Kirschner wire (K-wire)
fixation and volar locking-plate fixation for patients with dorsally-displaced
fractures of the distal radius. The cost effectiveness analysis (cost per quality-adjusted life
year; QALY) was derived from a multi-centre, two-arm, parallel group,
assessor-blind, randomised controlled trial which took place in
18 trauma centres in the United Kingdom. Data from 460 patients
were available for analysis, which includes both a National Health
Service cost perspective including costs of surgery, implants and
healthcare resource use over a 12-month period after surgery, and
a societal perspective, which includes the cost of time off work
and the need for additional private care. There was only a small difference in QALYs gained for patients
treated with locking-plate fixation over those treated with K-wires.
At a mean additional cost of £714 (95% confidence interval 588 to
865) per patient, locking-plate fixation presented an incremental
cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £89 322 per QALY within the first
12 months of treatment. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken to
assess the ICER of locking-plate fixation compared with K-wires.
These were greater than £30 000. Compared with locking-plate fixation, K-wire fixation is a ‘cost
saving’ intervention, with similar health benefits. Cite this article:
We compared the ceiling effects of two patient-rating
scores, the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and
Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), and a physician-rating score,
the Modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS) in assessing the outcome of
surgical treatment of an unstable distal radial fracture. A total
of 77 women with a mean age of 64.2 years (50 to 88) who underwent
fixation using a volar locking plate for an unstable distal radial fracture
between 2011 and 2013 were enrolled in this study. All completed
the DASH and PRWE questionnaires one year post-operatively and were
assessed using the MMWS by the senior author. The ceiling effects
in the outcome data assessed for each score were estimated. The data assessed with both patient-rating scores, the DASH and
PRWE, showed substantial ceiling effects, whereas the data assessed
with MMWS showed no ceiling effect. Researchers should be aware of a possible ceiling effect in the
assessment of the outcome of the surgical treatment of distal radial
fractures using patient-rating scores. It could also increase the
likelihood of a type II error. Cite this article:
The purpose of this study was to evaluate treatment
results following arthroscopic triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC)
debridement for recalcitrant ulnar wrist pain. According to the
treatment algorithm, 66 patients (36 men and 30 women with a mean
age of 38.1 years (15 to 67)) with recalcitrant ulnar wrist pain
were allocated to undergo ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO; n = 24),
arthroscopic TFCC repair (n = 15), arthroscopic TFCC debridement
(n = 14) or prolonged conservative treatment (n = 13). The mean
follow-up was 36.0 months (15 to 54). Significant differences in
Hand20 score at 18 months were evident between the USO group and
TFCC debridement group (p = 0.003), and between the TFCC repair
group and TFCC debridement group (p = 0.029). Within-group comparisons showed
that Hand20 score at five months or later and pain score at two
months or later were significantly decreased in the USO/TFCC repair
groups. In contrast, scores in the TFCC debridement/conservative
groups did not decrease significantly. Grip strength at 18 months
was significantly improved in the USO/TFCC repair groups, but not
in the TFCC debridement/conservative groups. TFCC debridement shows
little benefit on the clinical course of recalcitrant ulnar wrist
pain even after excluding patients with ulnocarpal abutment or TFCC
detachment from the fovea from the indications for arthroscopic
TFCC debridement. Cite this article:
We performed a retrospective study to determine
the effect of osteoporosis on the functional outcome of osteoporotic
distal radial fractures treated with a volar locking plate. Between
2009 and 2012 a total of 90 postmenopausal women with an unstable
fracture of the distal radius treated with a volar locking plate
were studied. Changes in the radiological parameters of 51 patients
with osteoporosis (group 1, mean age 66.9, mean T-score –3.16 ( We found that osteoporosis does not have a negative effect on
the functional outcome and additional analysis did not show a correlation
between T-score and outcome. Cite this article:
