To determine whether platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection improves outcomes two years after acute Achilles tendon rupture. A randomized multicentre two-arm parallel-group, participant- and assessor-blinded superiority trial was undertaken. Recruitment commenced on 28 July 2015 and two-year follow-up was completed in 21 October 2019. Participants were 230 adults aged 18 years and over, with acute Achilles tendon rupture managed with non-surgical treatment from 19 UK hospitals. Exclusions were insertion or musculotendinous junction injuries, major leg injury or deformity, diabetes, platelet or haematological disorder, medication with systemic corticosteroids, anticoagulation therapy treatment, and other contraindicating conditions. Participants were randomized via a central online system 1:1 to PRP or placebo injection. The main outcome measure was Achilles Tendon Rupture Score (ATRS) at two years via postal questionnaire. Other outcomes were pain, recovery goal attainment, and quality of life. Analysis was by intention-to-treat.Aims
Methods
It is imperative to understand the risks of operating on urgent cases during the COVID-19 (SARS-Cov-2 virus) pandemic for clinical decision-making and medical resource planning. The primary aim was to determine the mortality risk and associated variables when operating on urgent cases during the COVID-19 pandemic. The secondary objective was to assess differences in the outcome of patients treated between sites treating COVID-19 and a separate surgical site. The primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality. Secondary measures included complications of surgery, COVID-19 infection, and length of stay. Multiple variables were assessed for their contribution to the 30-day mortality. In total, 433 patients were included with a mean age of 65 years; 45% were male, and 90% were Caucasian.Aims
Methods
The PROximal Fracture of the Humerus: Evaluation by Randomisation (PROFHER) trial has recently demonstrated that surgery is non-superior to non-operative treatment in the management of displaced proximal humeral fractures. The objective of this study was to assess current surgical practice in the context of the PROFHER trial in terms of patient demographics, injury characteristics and the nature of the surgical treatment. A total of ten consecutive patients undergoing surgery for the treatment of a proximal humeral fracture from each of 11 United Kingdom hospitals were retrospectively identified over a 15 month period between January 2014 and March 2015. Data gathered for the 110 patients included patient demographics, injury characteristics, mode of surgical fixation, the grade of operating surgeon and the cost of the surgical implants.Objectives
Methods
This is a retrospective study of survivors of
recent conflicts with an open fracture of the femur. We analysed
the records of 48 patients (48 fractures) and assessed the outcome.
The median follow up for 47 patients (98%) was 37 months (interquartile
range 19 to 53); 31 (66%) achieved union; 16 (34%) had a revision
procedure, two of which were transfemoral amputation (4%). The New Injury Severity Score, the method of fixation, infection
and the requirement for soft-tissue cover were not associated with
a poor outcome. The degree of bone loss was strongly associated
with a poor outcome (p = 0.00204). A total of four patients developed
an infection; two with This study shows that, compared with historical experience, outcomes
after open fractures of the femur sustained on the battlefield are
good, with no mortality and low rates of infection and late amputation.
The degree of bone loss is closely associated with a poor outcome. Cite this article:
The open blast fracture of the pelvis is considered
to be the most severe injury within the spectrum of battlefield trauma.
We report our experience of 29 consecutive patients who had sustained
this injury in Afghanistan between 2008 and 2010. Their median new
injury severity score (NISS) was 41 (8 to 75), and mean blood requirement
in the first 24 hours was 60.3 units (0 to 224). In addition to
their orthopaedic injury, six had an associated vascular injury, seven
had a bowel injury, 11 had a genital injury and seven had a bladder
injury. In all, eight fractures were managed definitively with external
fixation and seven required internal fixation. Of those patients
who underwent internal fixation, four required removal of metalwork
for infection. Faecal diversion was performed in nine cases. The
median length of hospital stay following emergency repatriation
to the United Kingdom was 70.5 days (5 to 357) and the mean total
operating time was 29.6 hours (5 to 187). At a mean follow-up of
20.3 months (13.2 to 29.9), 24 patients (82.8%) were able to walk
and 26 (89.7%) had clinical and radiological evidence of stability
of the pelvic ring. As a result of the increase in terrorism, injuries that were
previously confined exclusively to warfare can now occur anywhere,
with civilian surgeons who are involved in trauma care potentially
required to manage similar injuries. Our study demonstrates that
the management of this injury pattern demands huge resources and significant
multidisciplinary input. Given the nature of the soft-tissue injury,
we would advocate external fixation as the preferred management
of these fractures. With the advent of emerging wound and faecal
management techniques, we do not believe that faecal diversion is
necessary in all cases.
The aim of this study was to report the pattern
of severe open diaphyseal tibial fractures sustained by military personnel,
and their orthopaedic–plastic surgical management. Cite this article:
The types of explosive devices used in warfare
and the pattern of war wounds have changed in recent years. There has,
for instance, been a considerable increase in high amputation of
the lower limb and unsalvageable leg injuries combined with pelvic
trauma. The conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan prompted the Department
of Military Surgery and Trauma in the United Kingdom to establish
working groups to promote the development of best practice and act
as a focus for research. In this review, we present lessons learnt in the initial care
of military personnel sustaining major orthopaedic trauma in the
Middle East.
Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal femur may be required to treat primary bone tumours or destructive metastases either with impending or established pathological fracture. Modular prostheses are available off the shelf and can be adapted to most reconstructive situations for this purpose. We have assessed the clinical and functional outcome of using the METS (Stanmore Implants Worldwide) modular tumour prosthesis to reconstruct the proximal femur in 100 consecutive patients between 2001 and 2006. We compared the results with the published series for patients managed with modular and custom-made endoprosthetic replacements for the same conditions. There were 52 males and 48 females with a mean age of 56.3 years (16 to 84) and a mean follow-up of 24.6 months (0 to 60). In 65 patients the procedure was undertaken for metastases, in 25 for a primary bone tumour, and in ten for other malignant conditions. A total of 46 patients presented with a pathological fracture, and 19 presented with failed fixation of a previous pathological fracture. The overall patient survival was 63.6% at one year and 23.1% at five years, and was significantly better for patients with a primary bone tumour than for those with metastatic tumour (82.3% vs 53.3%, respectively at one year (p = 0.003)). There were six early dislocations of which five could be treated by closed reduction. No patient needed revision surgery for dislocation. Revision surgery was required by six (6%) patients, five for pain caused by acetabular wear and one for tumour progression. Amputation was needed in four patients for local recurrence or infection. The estimated five-year implant survival with revision as the endpoint was 90.7%. The mean Toronto Extremity Salvage score was 61% (51% to 95%). The implant survival and complications resulting from the use of the modular system were comparable to the published series of both custom-made and other modular proximal femoral implants. We conclude that at intermediate follow-up the modular tumour prosthesis for proximal femur replacement provides versatility, a low incidence of implant-related complications and acceptable function for patients with metastatic tumours, pathological fractures and failed fixation of the proximal femur. It also functions as well as a custom-made endoprosthetic replacement.
