Patient dissatisfaction is not uncommon following primary total knee arthroplasty. One proposed method to alleviate this is by improving knee kinematics. Therefore, we aimed to answer the following research question: are there significant differences in knee kinematics based on the design of the tibial insert (cruciate-retaining (CR), ultra-congruent (UC), or medial congruent (MC))? Overall, 15 cadaveric knee joints were examined with a CR implant with three different tibial inserts (CR, UC, and MC) using an established knee joint simulator. The effects on coronal alignment, medial and lateral femoral roll back, femorotibial rotation, bony rotations (femur, tibia, and patella), and patellofemoral length ratios were determined.Aims
Methods
Aseptic loosening of the tibial component is a frequent cause of failure in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Management options include an isolated tibial revision or full component revision. A full component revision is frequently selected by surgeons unfamiliar with the existing implant or who simply wish to “start again”. This option adds morbidity compared with an isolated tibial revision. While isolated tibial revision has a lower morbidity, it is technically more challenging due to difficulties with exposure and maintaining prosthetic stability. This study was designed to compare these two reconstructive options. Patients undergoing revision TKA for isolated aseptic tibial loosening between 2012 and 2017 were identified. Those with revision implants or revised for infection, instability, osteolysis, or femoral component loosening were excluded. A total of 164 patients were included; 88 had an isolated tibial revision and 76 had revision of both components despite only having a loose tibial component. The demographics and clinical and radiological outcomes were recorded.Aims
Methods
Bariatric surgery has been advocated as a means
of reducing body mass index (BMI) and the risks associated with total
knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, this has not been proved clinically.
In order to determine the impact of bariatric surgery on the outcome
of TKA, we identified a cohort of 91 TKAs that were performed in
patients who had undergone bariatric surgery (bariatric cohort).
These were matched with two separate cohorts of patients who had not
undergone bariatric surgery. One was matched 1:1 with those with
a higher pre-bariatric BMI (high BMI group), and the other was matched
1:2 based on those with a lower pre-TKA BMI (low BMI group). In the bariatric group, the mean BMI before bariatric surgery
was 51.1 kg/m2 (37 to 72), which improved to 37.3 kg/m2 (24
to 59) at the time of TKA. Patients in the bariatric group had a
higher risk of, and worse survival free of, re-operation (hazard
ratio (HR) 2.6; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2 to 6.2; p = 0.02)
compared with the high BMI group. Furthermore, the bariatric group
had a higher risk of, and worse survival free of re-operation (HR
2.4; 95% CI 1.2 to 3.3; p = 0.2) and revision (HR 2.2; 95% CI 1.1
to 6.5; p = 0.04) compared with the low BMI group. While bariatric surgery reduced the BMI in our patients, more
analysis is needed before recommending bariatric surgery before
TKA in obese patients. Cite this article:
