Previous standards for assessing the reliability
of a measurement tool have lacked consistency. We reviewed the most
current American Society for Testing and Materials and International
Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) recommendations, and propose
an algorithm for orthopaedic surgeons. When assessing a measurement
tool, conditions of the experimental set-up and clear formulae used
to compile the results should be strictly reported. According to
these recent guidelines, accuracy is a confusing word with an overly
broad meaning and should therefore be abandoned. Depending on the
experimental conditions, one should be referring to bias (when the study
protocol involves accepted reference values), and repeatability
(sr, r) or reproducibility (SR, R). In the absence of accepted reference
values, only repeatability (sr, r) or reproducibility (SR, R) should
be provided. Take home message: Assessing the reliability of a measurement
tool involves reporting bias, repeatability and/or reproducibility
depending on the defined conditions, instead of precision or accuracy. Cite this article:
Most published randomised controlled trials which
compare the rates of wear of conventional and cross-linked (XL) polyethylene
(PE) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) have described their use with
a cementless acetabular component. We conducted a prospective randomised study to assess the rates
of penetration of two distinct types of PE in otherwise identical
cemented all-PE acetabular components. A total of 100 consecutive patients for THA were randomised to
receive an acetabular component which had been either highly XL
then remelted or moderately XL then annealed. After a minimum of eight years follow-up, 38 hips in the XL group
and 30 hips in the annealed group had complete data (mean follow-up
of 9.1 years (7.6 to 10.7) and 8.7 years (7.2 to 10.2), respectively).
In the XL group, the steady state rate of penetration from one year
onwards was -0.0002 mm/year ( These results show that the yearly linear rate of femoral head
penetration can be significantly reduced by using a highly XLPE
cemented acetabular component. Cite this article:
