The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and the Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) score in patients treated with a volar locking plate for a distal radial fracture. This study was a retrospective review of a prospective database of 155 patients who underwent internal fixation with a volar locking plate for a distal radial fracture between August 2014 and April 2017. Data which were collected included postoperative PROMs (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH) and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE)), and SANE scores at one month (n = 153), two months (n = 155), three months (n = 144), six months (n = 128), and one year (n = 73) after operation. Patients with incomplete data were excluded from this study. Correlation and agreement between PROMs and SANE scores were evaluated. Subgroup analyses were carried out to identify correlations according to variables such as age, the length of follow-up, and subcategories of the PRWE score.Aims
Methods
For over a decade, bisphosphonate administration
has evolved and become the cornerstone of the prevention and treatment
of fragility fractures. Millions of post-menopausal women have relied
on, and continue to depend on, the long-acting, bone density-maintaining
pharmaceutical drug to prevent low-energy fractures. In return,
we have seen the number of fragility fractures decrease, along with
associated costs and emotional benefits. However, with any drug,
there are often concerns with side effects and complications, and
this unique drug class is seeing one such complication in atypical
subtrochanteric femoral fracture, counterproductive to that which
it was designed to prevent. This has created concern over long-term
bisphosphonate administration and its potential link to these atypical
fractures. There is controversial evidence surrounding such a definitive
link, and no protocol for managing these fractures. This review offers the latest information regarding this rare
but increasingly controversial adverse effect and its potential
connection to one of the most successful forms of treatment that
is available for the management of fragility fractures.
