To assess complications and failure mechanisms of osteoarticular
allograft reconstructions for primary bone tumours. We retrospectively evaluated 38 patients (28 men, 74%) who were
treated at our institution with osteoarticular allograft reconstruction
between 1989 and 2010. Median age was 19 years (interquartile range
14 to 32). Median follow-up was 19.5 years (95% confidence interval
(CI) 13.0 to 26.1) when 26 patients (68%) were alive. In addition, we
systematically searched the literature for clinical studies on osteoarticular
allografts, finding 31 studies suitable for analysis. Results of
papers that reported on one site exclusively were pooled for comparison.Aims
Patients and Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 33
consecutive patients who had undergone an extra-articular, total or
partial scapulectomy for a malignant tumour of the shoulder girdle
between 1 July 2001 and 30 September 2013. Of these, 26 had tumours
which originated in the scapula or the adjacent soft tissue and
underwent a classic Tikhoff–Linberg procedure, while seven with
tumours arising from the proximal humerus were treated with a modified
Tikhoff-Linberg operation. We used a Ligament Advanced Reinforcement
System for soft-tissue reconstruction in nine patients, but not
in the other 24. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score (MSTS) was 17.6
(95% confidence interval (CI) 15.9 to 19.4); 17.6 (95% CI 15.5 to
19.6) after the classic Tikhoff–Linberg procedure and 18.1 (95%
CI 13.8 to 22.3) after the modified Tikhoff–Linberg procedure. Patients
who had undergone a LARS soft-tissue reconstruction had a mean score
of 18.6 (95% (CI) 13.9 to 22.4) compared with 17.2 (95% CI 15.5
to 19.0) for those who did not. The Tikhoff–Linberg procedure is a useful method for wide resection
of a malignant tumour of the shoulder girdle which helps to preserve
hand and elbow function. The method of soft-tissue reconstruction
has no effect on functional outcome. Cite this article:
Between 1997 and 2007, 68 consecutive patients underwent replacement of the proximal humerus for tumour using a fixed-fulcrum massive endoprosthesis. Their mean age was 46 years (7 to 87). Ten patients were lost to follow-up and 16 patients died. The 42 surviving patients were assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) Score and the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) at a mean follow-up of five years and 11 months (one year to ten years and nine months). The mean MSTS score was 72.3% (53.3% to 100%) and the mean TESS was 77.2% (58.6% to 100%). Four of 42 patients received a new constrained humeral liner to reduce the risk of dislocation. This subgroup had a mean MSTS score of 77.7% and a mean TESS of 80.0%. The dislocation rate for the original prosthesis was 25.9; none of the patients with the new liner had a dislocation at a mean of 14.5 months (12 to 18). Endoprosthetic replacement for tumours of the proximal humerus using this prosthesis is a reliable operation yielding good results without the documented problems of unconstrained prostheses. The performance of this prosthesis is expected to improve further with a new constrained humeral liner, which reduces the risk of dislocation.
