Fractures of the navicular can occur in isolation but, owing
to the intimate anatomical and biomechanical relationships, are
often associated with other injuries to the neighbouring bones and
joints in the foot. As a result, they can lead to long-term morbidity
and poor function. Our aim in this study was to identify patterns
of injury in a new classification system of traumatic fractures
of the navicular, with consideration being given to the commonly associated
injuries to the midfoot. We undertook a retrospective review of 285 consecutive patients
presenting over an eight- year period with a fracture of the navicular.
Five common patterns of injury were identified and classified according
to the radiological features. Type 1 fractures are dorsal avulsion
injuries related to the capsule of the talonavicular joint. Type
2 fractures are isolated avulsion injuries to the tuberosity of
the navicular. Type 3 fractures are a variant of tarsometatarsal
fracture/dislocations creating instability of the medial ray. Type
4 fractures involve the body of the navicular with no associated
injury to the lateral column and type 5 fractures occur in conjunction
with disruption of the midtarsal joint with crushing of the medial
or lateral, or both, columns of the foot.Aims
Patients and Methods
Patients with diabetes are at increased risk of wound complications
after open reduction and internal fixation of unstable ankle fractures.
A fibular nail avoids large surgical incisions and allows anatomical
reduction of the mortise. We retrospectively reviewed the results of fluoroscopy-guided
reduction and percutaneous fibular nail fixation for unstable Weber
type B or C fractures in 24 adult patients with type 1 or type 2
diabetes. The re-operation rate for wound dehiscence or other indications
such as amputation, mortality and functional outcomes was determined.Aims
Patients and Methods
In this retrospective cohort study, we analysed
the incidence and functional outcome of a distal tibiofibular synostosis.
Patients with an isolated AO type 44-B or C fracture of the ankle
who underwent surgical treatment between 1995 and 2007 were invited
for clinical and radiological review. The American Orthopaedic Foot
and Ankle Society score, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
score and a visual analogue score for pain were used to assess outcome. A total of 274 patients were available; the mean follow-up was
9.7 years (8 to 18). The extent of any calcification or synostosis
at the level of the distal interosseous membrane or syndesmosis
on the contemporary radiographs was defined as: no or minor calcifications
(group 1), severe calcification (group 2), or complete synostosis
(group 3). A total of 222 (81%) patients were in group 1, 37 (14%) in group
2 and 15 (5%) in group 3. There was no significant difference in
incidence between AO type 44-B and type 44-C fractures (p = 0.89).
Severe calcification or synostosis occurred in 21 patients (19%)
in whom a syndesmotic screw was used and in 31 (19%) in whom a syndesmotic screw
was not used.(p = 0.70). No significant differences were found between
the groups except for a greater reduction in mean dorsiflexion in
group 2 (p = 0.004). This is the largest study on distal tibiofibular synostosis,
and we found that a synostosis is a frequent complication of surgery
for a fracture of the ankle. Although it theoretically impairs the
range of movement of the ankle, it did not affect the outcome. Our findings suggest that synostosis of the distal tibiofibular
syndesmosis in general does not warrant treatment. Cite this article:
Clinicians are often asked by patients, “When
can I drive again?” after lower limb injury or surgery. This question
is difficult to answer in the absence of any guidelines. This review
aims to collate the currently available evidence and discuss the
factors that influence the decision to allow a patient to return
to driving. There is currently insufficient evidence for any authoritative
body to determine fitness to drive. The lack of guidance could result
in patients being withheld from driving for longer than is necessary,
or returning to driving while still unsafe. Cite this article:
