The primary objective of this study was to compare accuracy in restoring the native centre of hip rotation in patients undergoing conventional manual total hip arthroplasty (THA) This prospective cohort study included 50 patients undergoing conventional manual THA and 25 patients receiving robotic-arm assisted THA. Patients undergoing conventional manual THA and robotic-arm assisted THA were well matched for age (mean age, 69.4 years (Objectives
Materials and Methods
One goal of total hip arthroplasty is to restore normal hip anatomy.
The aim of this study was to compare displacement of the centre
of rotation (COR) using a standard reaming technique with a technique
in which the acetabulum was reamed immediately peripherally and
referenced off the rim. In the first cohort the acetabulum was reamed to the floor followed
by sequentially larger reamers. In the second cohort the acetabulum
was only reamed peripherally, starting with a reamer the same size
as the native femoral head. Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs were
analysed for acetabular floor depth and vertical and horizontal position
of the COR.Aims
Patients and Methods
Following the recall of modular neck hip stems
in July 2012, research into femoral modularity will intensify over
the next few years. This review aims to provide surgeons with an
up-to-date summary of the clinically relevant evidence. The development
of femoral modularity, and a classification system, is described.
The theoretical rationale for modularity is summarised and the clinical
outcomes are explored. The review also examines the clinically relevant problems
reported following the use of femoral stems with a modular neck. Joint replacement registries in the United Kingdom and Australia
have provided data on the failure rates of modular devices but cannot
identify the mechanism of failure. This information is needed to
determine whether modular neck femoral stems will be used in the
future, and how we should monitor patients who already have them implanted. Cite this article:
Over an eight-month period we prospectively enrolled 122 patients who underwent arthroscopic surgery of the hip for femoroacetabular impingement and met the inclusion criteria for this study. Patients with bilateral hip arthroscopy, avascular necrosis and previous hip surgery were excluded. Ten patients refused to participate leaving 112 in the study. There were 62 women and 50 men. The mean age of the patients was 40.6 yrs (95% confidence interval (CI) 37.7 to 43.5). At arthroscopy, 23 patients underwent osteoplasty only for cam impingement, three underwent rim trimming only for pincer impingement, and 86 underwent both procedures for mixed-type impingement. The mean follow-up was 2.3 years (2.0 to 2.9). The mean modified Harris hip score (HHS) improved from 58 to 84 (mean difference = 24 (95% CI 19 to 28)) and the median patient satisfaction was 9 (1 to 10). Ten patients underwent total hip replacement at a mean of 16 months (8 to 26) after arthroscopy. The predictors of a better outcome were the pre-operative modified HHS (p = 0.018), joint space narrowing ≥ 2 mm (p = 0.005), and repair of labral pathology instead of debridement (p = 0.032). Hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement, accompanied by suitable rehabilitation, gives a good short-term outcome and high patient satisfaction.
