At least four ways have been described to determine
femoral component rotation, and three ways to determine tibial component
rotation in total knee replacement (TKR). Each method has its advocates
and each has an influence on knee kinematics and the ultimate short
and long term success of TKR. Of the four femoral component methods,
the author prefers rotating the femoral component in flexion to
that amount that establishes a stable symmetrical flexion gap. This
judgement is made after the soft tissues of the knee have been balanced
in extension. Of the three tibial component methods, the author prefers rotating
the tibial component into congruency with the established femoral
component rotation with the knee is in extension. This yields a
rotationally congruent articulation during weight-bearing and should
minimise the torsional forces being transferred through a conforming tibial
insert, which could lead to wear to the underside of the tibial
polyethylene. Rotating platform components will compensate for any
mal-rotation, but can still lead to pain if excessive tibial insert
rotation causes soft-tissue impingement. Cite this article:
PCL retaining fixed-bearing TKA is a highly successful
operation with the need for more surgery occurring at the rate of
approximately 0.4% per year over the first 27 years. The most common
cause for revision surgery is related to polyethylene insert failure
and accounts for approximately 50% of re-operations. Late metastatic
infection is the next most frequent cause followed by patellar problems,
late instability and component loosening in decreasing frequency.
A myriad of rare miscellaneous problems can also occur.
A consecutive series of 235 total knee arthroplasties using the PFC system was followed prospectively for at least ten years in 186 patients. The operation was for osteoarthritis in 150 knees, for rheumatoid arthritis in 83, and for Paget’s disease and femoral osteonecrosis in one knee each. At the latest review 56 patients had died, fi ve were too ill to assess and three could not be traced. The PFC knee replacement utilised was a nonconforming posterior-cruciate-retaining prosthesis with a polyethylene insert which is fl at in the sagittal plane. The patella was resurfaced using a metal-backed component in 170 cases, but later in the series we used an all-polyethylene component in 22 knees; 43 patellae were not resurfaced. The survival without need for reoperation for any reason was 90% at ten years. Nineteen revisions were component-related due to failure of nine metal-backed patellae, nine polyethylene inserts, and one unresurfaced patella; two reoperations were for synovectomy (one for recurrent haemarthrosis and one for recurrent rheumatoid synovitis) and three were for metastatic joint infection. There were no revisions for aseptic loosening of femoral or tibial components, or the all-polyethylene patellar replacement. The PFC system provides good and predictable results in tricompartmental arthritis of the knee. Loosening appeared to be negligible, but there were wear-related problems in 8%. The change from a metal-backed patella and an increase in the contact area of the tibial insert should provide further improvement by minimising wear.
