The role of modular tibial implants in total knee replacement is not fully defined. We performed a prospective randomised controlled clinical trial using radiostereophotogrammetric analysis to compare the performance of an all-polyethylene tibia with a metal-backed cruciate-retaining condylar design, PFC-∑ total knee replacement for up to 24 months. There were 51 patients who were randomised into two treatment groups. There were 10 subsequent withdrawals, leaving 21 all-polyethylene and 20 metal-backed tibial implants. No patient was lost to follow-up. There were no significant demographic differences between the groups. At two years one metal-backed implant showed migration > 1 mm, but no polyethylene implant reached this level. There was a significant increase in the SF-12 and Oxford knee scores after operation in both groups.

In an uncomplicated primary total knee replacement the all-polyethylene PFC-∑ tibial prosthesis showed no statistical difference in migration from that of the metal-backed counterpart. There was no difference in the clinical results as assessed by the SF-12, the Oxford knee score, alignment or range of movement at 24 months, although these assessment measures were not statistically powered in this study.

Ulceration of the lower leg is considered to be a ‘hard’ clinical endpoint of venous thrombosis. Total knee replacement (TKR) is a significant risk factor for venous thrombosis of the leg and therefore potentially for ulceration.

We sent a postal questionnaire to 244 patients at a minimum of five years after TKR enquiring about the development of ulceration since their TKR. The overall incidence of ulceration, both active and healed, was 8.67% which is similar to that in the age-matched general population (9.6% to 12.6%), as was the prevalence of active ulceration. We also identified no clear association between venographically-confirmed postoperative deep-venous thrombosis (DVT) and the incidence and prevalence of ulcers at five years. We suggest that after TKR DVT is not a significant risk factor for ulceration of the leg and that perioperative chemical thromboprophylaxis may not be justified on these grounds.