The Advance Medial-Pivot total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was designed
to reflect contemporary data regarding the kinematics of the knee.
We wished to examine the long-term results obtained with this prosthesis
by extending a previous evaluation. We retrospectively evaluated prospectively collected data from
225 consecutive patients (41 men and 184 women; mean age at surgery
71 years, 52 to 84) who underwent 284 TKAs with a mean follow-up
of 13.4 years (11 to 15). Implant failure, complication rate, clinical (both
subjective and objective) and radiological outcome were assessed.
Pre- and post-operative clinical and radiographic data were available
at regular intervals for all patients. A total of ten patients (4.4%;
ten TKAs) were lost to follow-up.Aims
Patients and Methods
We report the clinical and radiological results of a two- to three-year prospective randomised study which was designed to compare a minimally-invasive technique with a standard technique in total knee replacement and was undertaken between January 2004 and May 2007. The mini-midvastus approach was used on 50 patients (group A) and a standard approach on 50 patients (group B). The mean follow-up in both groups was 23 months (24 to 35). The functional outcome was better in group A up to nine months after operation, as shown by statistically significant differences in the mean function score, mean total score and the mean Oxford knee score (all, p = 0.05). Patients in group A had statistically significant greater early flexion (p = 0.04) and reached their greatest mean knee flexion of 126.5° (95° to 135°) 21 days after operation. However, at final follow-up there was no significant difference in the mean maximum flexion between the groups (p = 0.08). Technical errors were identified in six patients from group A (12%) on radiological evaluation. Based on these results, the authors currently use minimally-invasive techniques in total knee replacement in selected cases only.
