The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of conducting a full-scale, appropriately powered, randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing internal fracture fixation and distal femoral replacement (DFR) for distal femoral fractures in older patients. Seven centres recruited patients into the study. Patients were eligible if they were greater than 65 years of age with a distal femoral fracture, and if the surgeon felt that they were suitable for either form of treatment. Outcome measures included the patients’ willingness to participate, clinicians’ willingness to recruit, rates of loss to follow-up, the ability to capture data, estimates of standard deviation to inform the sample size calculation, and the main determinants of cost. The primary clinical outcome measure was the EuroQol five-dimensional index (EQ-5D) at six months following injury.Aims
Patients and Methods
This study explores the relationship between
delay to surgical debridement and deep infection in a series of
364 consecutive patients with 459 open fractures treated at an academic
level one trauma hospital in North America. The mean delay to debridement for all fractures was 10.6 hours
(0.6 to 111.5). There were 46 deep infections (10%). There were
no infections among the 55 Gustilo-Anderson grade I open fractures.
Among the grade II and III injuries, a statistically significant
increase in the rate of deep infection was found for each hour of
delay (OR = 1.033: 95% CI 1.01 to 1.057). This relationship shows
a linear increase of 3% per hour of delay. No distinct time cut-off
points were identified. Deep infection was also associated with
tibial fractures (OR = 2.44: 95% CI 1.26 to 4.73), a higher Gustilo-Anderson
grade (OR = 1.99: 95% CI 1.004 to 3.954), and contamination of the
fracture (OR = 3.12: 95% CI 1.36 to 7.36). These individual effects
are additive, which suggests that delayed debridement will have
a clinically significant detrimental effect on more severe open
fractures. Delayed treatment appeared safe for grade 1 open fractures. However,
when the negative prognostic factors of tibial site, high grade
of fracture and/or contamination are present we recommend more urgent
operative debridement. Cite this article:
