Few risk factors for rotator cuff disease (RCD) and corresponding treatment have been firmly established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between numerous risk factors and the incidence of surgery for RCD in a large cohort. A population-based cohort of people aged between 40 and 69 years in the UK (the UK Biobank) was studied. People who underwent surgery for RCD were identified through a link with NHS inpatient records covering a mean of eight years after enrolment. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) as estimates of associations with surgery for RCD accounting for confounders. The risk factors which were considered included age, sex, race, education, Townsend deprivation index, body mass index (BMI), occupational demands, and exposure to smoking.Aims
Methods
The aim of this review is to address controversies
in the management of dislocations of the acromioclavicular joint. Current
evidence suggests that operative rather than non-operative treatment
of Rockwood grade III dislocations results in better cosmetic and
radiological results, similar functional outcomes and longer time
off work. Early surgery results in better functional and radiological
outcomes with a reduced risk of infection and loss of reduction compared
with delayed surgery. Surgical options include acromioclavicular fixation, coracoclavicular
fixation and coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. Although
non-controlled studies report promising results for arthroscopic
coracoclavicular fixation, there are no comparative studies with
open techniques to draw conclusions about the best surgical approach.
Non-rigid coracoclavicular fixation with tendon graft or synthetic
materials, or rigid acromioclavicular fixation with a hook plate,
is preferable to fixation with coracoclavicular screws owing to
significant risks of loosening and breakage. The evidence, although limited, also suggests that anatomical
ligament reconstruction with autograft or certain synthetic grafts
may have better outcomes than non-anatomical transfer of the coracoacromial
ligament. It has been suggested that this is due to better restoration
horizontal and vertical stability of the joint. Despite the large number of recently published studies, there
remains a lack of high-quality evidence, making it difficult to
draw firm conclusions regarding these controversial issues. Cite this article:
