The success rates of two-stage revision arthroplasty for infection have evolved since their early description. The implementation of internationally accepted outcome criteria led to the readjustment of such rates. However, patients who do not undergo reimplantation are usually set aside from these calculations. The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of two-stage revision arthroplasty when considering those who do not undergo reimplantation, and to investigate the characteristics of this subgroup. A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Patients with chronic hip or knee periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) treated with two-stage revision between January 2010 and October 2018, with a minimum follow-up of one year, were included. Variables including demography, morbidity, microbiology, and outcome were collected. The primary endpoint was the eradication of infection. Patients who did not undergo reimplantation were analyzed in order to characterize this subgroup better.Aims
Methods
Tissue responses to debris formed by abrasion of polymethylmethacrylate
(PMMA) spacers at two-stage revision arthroplasty for prosthetic
joint infection are not well described. We hypothesised that PMMA
debris induces immunomodulation in periprosthetic tissues. Samples of tissue were taken during 35 two-stage revision arthroplasties
(nine total hip and 26 total knee arthroplasties) in patients whose
mean age was 67 years (44 to 85). Fourier transform infrared microscopy
was used to confirm the presence of PMMA particles. Histomorphometry
was performed using Sudan Red and Haematoxylin-Eosin staining.
CD-68, CD-20, CD-11(c), CD-3 and IL-17 antibodies were used to immunophenotype
the inflammatory cells. All slides were scored semi-quantitatively
using the modified Willert scoring system.Aims
Patients and Methods
Cut-off values with highest sensitivity and specificity
for the synovial fluid white cell and differential count will facilitate
the accurate diagnosis of infection in total knee (TKR) and total
hip replacement (THR). All patients undergoing revision TKR or THR
for suspected prosthetic joint infection between 2009 and 2011 at
two hospitals were identified. A total of 75 patients were included
with a mean age of 70.3 years (38 to 89). Synovial fluid was aspirated
pre-operatively and peri-prosthetic tissue samples were taken intra-operatively
for histological and microbiological examination. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots were constructed
for white cell and differential counts in aspirated fluid. The optimal
cut-off for TKR and THR was 1590 white cells/µl and 65% neutrophilia.
The white cell count cut-off value identified for THR was notably
lower than previously quoted in the literature. A cut-off value
for white cell count in synovial aspirate in suspected prosthetic
joint infection of between 1100 and 1700 white cells/µl is likely
to be applicable to both THR and TKR. Cite this article:
The purpose of this study was to compare the
diagnostic accuracy for the detection of infection between the culture of
fluid obtained by sonication (SFC) and the culture of peri-implant
tissues (PITC) in patients with early and delayed implant failure,
and those with unsuspected and suspected septic failure. It was
hypothesised that SFC increases the diagnostic accuracy for infection
in delayed, but not early, implant failure, and in unsuspected septic
failure. The diagnostic accuracy for infection of all consecutive
implants (hardware or prostheses) that were removed for failure was
compared between SFC and PITC. This prospective study included 317
patients with a mean age of 62.7 years (9 to 97). The sensitivity
for detection of infection using SFC was higher than using PITC
in an overall comparison (89.9% Sonication is mainly recommended when there is implant failure
with no clear signs of infection and in patients with delayed implant
failure. In early failure, SFC is not superior to PITC for the diagnosis
of infection and, therefore, is not recommended as a routine diagnostic
test in these patients. Cite this article:
