We carried out a systematic review of the literature
to evaluate the evidence regarding the clinical results of the Ilizarov
method in the treatment of long bone defects of the lower limbs. Only 37 reports (three non-randomised comparative studies, one
prospective study and 33 case-series) met our inclusion criteria.
Although several studies were unsatisfactory in terms of statistical
heterogeneity, our analysis appears to show that the Ilizarov method
of distraction osteogenesis significantly reduced the risk of deep
infection in infected osseous lesions (risk ratio 0.14 (95% confidence
interval (CI) 0.10 to 0.20), p <
0.001). However, there was a
rate of re-fracture of 5% (95% CI 3 to 7), with a rate of neurovascular
complications of 2.2% (95% CI 0.3 to 4) and an amputation rate of
2.9% (95% CI 1.4 to 4.4).The data was generally not statistically
heterogeneous. Where tibial defects were >
8 cm, the risk of re-fracture
increased (odds ratio 3.7 (95% CI 1.1 to 12.5), p = 0.036). The technique is demanding for patients, illustrated by the voluntary
amputation rate of 1.6% (95% CI 0 to 3.1), which underlines the
need for careful patient selection. Cite this article:
We present the results of the surgical correction of lower-limb deformities caused by metabolic bone disease. Our series consisted of 17 patients with a diagnosis of hypophosphataemic rickets and two with renal osteodystrophy; their mean age was 25.6 years (14 to 57). In all, 43 lower-limb segments (27 femora and 16 tibiae) were osteotomised and the deformity corrected using a monolateral external fixator. The segment was then stabilised with locked intramedullary nailing. In addition, six femora in three patients were subsequently lengthened by distraction osteogenesis. The mean follow-up was 60 months (18 to 120). The frontal alignment parameters (the mechanical axis deviation, the lateral distal femoral angle and the medial proximal tibial angle) and the sagittal alignment parameters (the posterior distal femoral angle and the posterior proximal tibial angle) improved post-operatively. The external fixator was removed either at the end of surgery or at the end of the lengthening period, allowing for early mobilisation and weight-bearing. We encountered five problems and four obstacles in the programme of treatment. The use of intramedullary nails prevented recurrence of deformity and refracture.
Advances in the design of the components for total ankle replacement have led to a resurgence of interest in this procedure. Between January 1999 and December 2004, 16 patients with a failed total ankle replacement were referred to our unit. In the presence of infection, a two-stage salvage procedure was planned. The first involved the removal of the components and the insertion of a cement spacer. Definitive treatment options included hindfoot fusion with a circular frame or amputation. When there was no infection, a one-stage salvage procedure was planned. Options included hindfoot fusion with an intramedullary nail or revision total ankle replacement. When there was suspicion of infection, a percutaneous biopsy was performed. The patients were followed up for a minimum of 12 months. Of the 16 patients, 14 had aseptic loosening, five of whom underwent a revision total ankle replacement and nine a hindfoot fusion. Of the two with infection, one underwent fusion and the other a below-knee amputation. There were no cases of wound breakdown, nonunion or malunion. Management of the failed total ankle replacement should be performed by experienced surgeons and ideally in units where multidisciplinary support is available. Currently, a hindfoot fusion appears to be preferable to a revision total ankle replacement.
